BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maini, R.
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, H. R
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:1283-1286 ( November )

World view

Correction of refractive error in the Victorian population: the feasibility of "off the shelf" spectacles Raj Maini, Jill Keeffe, Le Ann Weih, Catherine A McCarty, Hugh R Taylor

Centre for Eye Research Australia, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence to: Dr J Keeffe, Centre for Eye Research Australia, University of Melbourne, 32 Gisborne Street, East Melbourne, Victoria 3002, Australia jillek{at}unimelb.edu.au

Accepted for publication 21 June 2001

AIMS---To assess the feasibility of providing a stock of ready made spectacles for correction of refractive error in the general population.
METHODS---Data were collected in the Visual Impairment Project, a population based survey of Victorian residents aged 40 years or older in randomly selected urban and rural sample areas. This included a refractive eye examination and the proportion of subjects with hypermetropia, emmetropia (defined as -1.0 to +1.0D spherical equivalent), and myopia documented in the 40-60 year age group.
RESULTS---2595 (54.8%) participants were aged between 40 and 60 years. Those with a best corrected visual acuity of less than 6/12, astigmatism of more than 1.25D, and anisometropia of more than 0.5D were excluded. 516 participants had refractive error which was deemed suitable for correction by "off the shelf" spectacles. This represents 19.9% of all participants between 40 and 60 years of age. Provision of spectacles in 0.5D increments would provide suitable stock spectacles for 85.5% of a -3.0 to +3.0D range or 89.2% of a -3.50 to +3.50D range.
CONCLUSIONS---Ready made "off the shelf" spectacles could significantly alleviate visual morbidity due to refractive error in up to 20% of an urban population in Australia. This approach may also be useful in developing countries with poor access to optometric services.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.