BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ziakas, N G
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, M P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ziakas, N G
Right arrow Articles by Clarke, M P
Br J Ophthalmol 2001;85:807-810 ( July )

Scientific correspondence

Regionalisation of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening improves compliance with guidelines: an audit of ROP screening in the Northern Region of England N G Ziakasa, D G Cottrella, D W A Milliganb, P M Pennefathera, M A Bamashmusa, M P Clarkea

a Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK, b Department of Neonatology

Correspondence to: Mr David Cottrell, Eye Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, UK D.G.Cottrell{at}ncl.ac.uk

Accepted for publication 22 January 2001

AIMS---This project was designed to determine whether a coordinated regional strategy can improve the implementation of national guidelines for screening for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and to identify causes for failure of compliance.
METHODS---Retrospective case note audit relating to two periods, 1990-1 and 1994, involving all 17 neonatal intensive care units in the Northern Region of England. Between the two periods, a regional strategy was instituted in an endeavour to improve compliance. Babies born in or admitted to the units during the study periods who were eligible for ROP screening were included. Screening performance was assessed against a standard of 100% compliance with the guidelines. In the second audit period compliance with subsidiary standards was also measured, and reasons for failure were identified.
RESULTS---Compliance improved from 47% (262/558) in the first audit cycle to 73% (264/360) in the second. Subgroup analysis in this second cycle indicated better compliance (93.3%) in higher risk babies (=< 29 weeks' gestational age). Babies transferred between units, discharged home before screening, or who failed to qualify for screening on one of the two defined criteria, were more likely to be missed.
CONCLUSION---A carefully implemented regional approach to screening resulted in a higher uptake for babies most at risk. Simple recommendations are made to achieve further improvement in compliance with the guidelines. The wider implications for screening in other conditions and in other areas and specialties are highlighted.


© 2001 by British Journal of Ophthalmology






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2001 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.