BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Soong, H K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugar, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Soong, H K.
Right arrow Articles by Sugar, A
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:296-298
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


CLINICAL SCIENCE

Diamond burr superficial keratectomy for recurrent corneal erosions

H Kaz Soong, Q Farjo, R F Meyer, A Sugar

WK Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan Medical School

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
H Kaz Soong, MD, WK Kellogg Eye Center, 1000 Wall Street, Ann Arbor, MI 48105, USA;
hksoong{at}umich.edu

Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of diamond burr superficial keratectomy in the treatment of recurrent corneal erosions.

Methods: A retrospective review of 54 eyes (47 patients) with recurrent corneal erosions treated with diamond burr superficial keratectomy. Preoperative and postoperative visual acuities and refractions, slit lamp examination findings, and the incidence of recurrent erosion after keratectomy were studied. Specular microscopy was also performed in six patients before and after surgery.

Results: 30 eyes had underlying map dot fingerprint anterior basement membrane corneal dystrophy, while 24 eyes did not. Postoperative follow up time ranged from 3 to 53 months (mean 12.3 months). Corneal erosion recurred in three eyes (6%) after diamond burr superficial keratectomy. This procedure improved the best corrected visual acuity from 20/26 to 20/22 by logMAR statistical evaluation (p=0.002) and caused very little change in the refractive spherical equivalent. No endothelial cell loss or changes in morphology were noted on specular microscopy.

Conclusion: Diamond burr superficial keratectomy appears to be an effective and safe method of treating recurrent erosions and is a good alternative therapy to needle stromal micropuncture, Nd:YAG induced epithelial adhesion, and excimer laser surface ablation.


Keywords: erosions; cornea; keratectomy; diamond burr




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Pal-Ghosh, A. Pajoohesh-Ganji, M. Brown, and M. A. Stepp
A Mouse Model for the Study of Recurrent Corneal Epithelial Erosions: {alpha}9{beta}1 Integrin Implicated in Progression of the Disease
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2004; 45(6): 1775 - 1788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.