BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yorston, D
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yorston, D
Right arrow Articles by Foster, A
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:543-547
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


CLINICAL SCIENCE

Does prospective monitoring improve cataract surgery outcomes in Africa?

D Yorston1, S Gichuhi2, M Wood3, A Foster4

1 Department of Epidemiology and International Eye Health, Institute of Ophthalmology, Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK
2 Kikuyu Eye Unit, Kikuyu, Kenya
3 CCBRT Eye Hospital, Dar-es-Salaam, Tanzania
4 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London WC1E7HT, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr David Yorston, Department of Epidemiology and International Eye Health, Institute of Ophthalmology, Bath Street, London EC1V 9EL, UK;
dhyorston{at}enterprise.net

Aims: To determine if prospective monitoring influences cataract surgical outcomes in east Africa.

Methods: A prospective observational study of all routine extracapsular cataract extractions with posterior chamber lens implants carried out at Kikuyu Eye Unit, Kenya, between 1 January 1999 and 31 December 1999.

Results: Out of 1845 eligible eyes 1800 were included in the study. Two months' follow up was available in 67.2% of patients. The proportion achieving a good outcome increased steadily from 77.1% in the first quarter to 89.4% in the fourth quarter ({chi}2 for trend, p<0.001). There was no change in the incidence of operative complications; however, the proportion of patients achieving a good visual outcome following vitreous loss increased from 47.2% in the first 6 months to 71.0% in the last 6 months ({chi}2 p<0.05). Of the eyes with poor outcome (best corrected acuity <6/60 at 2 months) half were due to pre-existing eye diseases. The proportion of patients with known ocular comorbidity decreased from 10.2% in the first quarter to 5.9% in the fourth quarter ({chi}2 for trend, p<0.05). Poor outcome was associated with age over 80 years, known diabetes, preoperative bilateral blindness, any ocular comorbidity, and intraoperative vitreous loss.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates improvement in visual outcome results after cataract surgery over a 1 year period. Monitoring of outcomes appears to be associated with a change in surgeons' attitudes, leading to greater emphasis on appropriate case selection, better management of surgical complications, and improved visual outcomes.


Keywords: cataract surgery; Africa; monitoring




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C. Eusebio, H. Kuper, S. Polack, J. Enconado, N. Tongson, D. Dionio, A. DumDum, H. Limburg, and A. Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness in Negros Island and Antique District, Philippines
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1588 - 1592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J. E. Oye and H. Kuper
Prevalence and causes of blindness and visual impairment in Limbe urban area, South West Province, Cameroon
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1435 - 1439.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
Z Wadud, H Kuper, S Polack, R Lindfield, M R Akm, K A Choudhury, T Lindfield, H Limburg, and A Foster
Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and needs assessment of cataract surgical services in Satkhira District, Bangladesh
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1225 - 1229.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H Limburg, A Foster, C Gilbert, G J Johnson, M Kyndt, and M Myatt
Routine monitoring of visual outcome of cataract surgery. Part 2: Results from eight study centres
Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2005; 89(1): 50 - 52.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K M Waddell, B C Reeves, and G J Johnson
A comparison of anterior and posterior chamber lenses after cataract extraction in rural Africa: a within patient randomised trial
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2004; 88(6): 734 - 739.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. Li, N. Morlet, J. Q. Ng, J. B. Semmens, and M. W. Knuiman
Significant Nonsurgical Risk Factors for Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: EPSWA Fourth Report
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 1321 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R P Wormald and A Foster
Cataract surgery
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2004; 88(5): 601 - 602.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Hennig, J Kumar, D Yorston, and A Foster
Sutureless cataract surgery with nucleus extraction: outcome of a prospective study in Nepal
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2003; 87(3): 266 - 270.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.