This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gardiner, S K Articles by Crabb, D P Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gardiner, S K Articles by Crabb, D P

Frequency of testing for detecting visual field progression

Faculty of Science and Mathematics, The Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr D P Crabb, Faculty of Science and Mathematics, Nottingham Trent University, Clifton Campus, Nottingham NG11 8NS, UK;
david.crabb{at}ntu.ac.uk

Aims: To investigate the effect of frequency of testing on the determination of visual field progression using pointwise linear regression (PLR).

Methods: A "virtual eye" was developed to simulate series of sensitivities over time at a given point in the eye. The user can input the actual behaviour of the point (for example, stable or deteriorating steadily), and then a configurable amount of noise is added to produce a realistic series over time. The advantage of this over using patient data is that the actual status of the eye is known. Series were generated using different frequencies of testing, and the diagnosis that would have been made from each series was compared with the true status of the eye. A point was diagnosed as progressing if the regression line for the series showed a deterioration of at least 1 dB per year, significant at the 1% level. From these results, graphs were produced showing the number of points correctly or incorrectly diagnosed as progressing.

Results: With the virtual eye deteriorating at a rate of 2 dB/year, it was found that the point was determined to be progressing quicker when more tests were carried out each year. With a stable virtual eye, it was found that increasing the frequency of testing increased the number of series that were falsely labelled as progressing during the first 3 years of testing.

Conclusions: As the frequency of testing increases, the sensitivity of PLR increases. However, the specificity decreases; possibly meaning more unnecessary changes in treatment. Three tests per year provide a good compromise between sensitivity and specificity.

Keywords: perimetry; visual fields; linear regression; computer simulation

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M G. de la Rosa Method to increase the sensitivity of perimetric trend progression analysis Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2008; 92(11): 1564 - 1565. [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. M. F. Owen, D. P. Crabb, E. T. White, A. C. Viswanathan, D. F. Garway-Heath, and R. A. Hitchings Glaucoma and Fitness to Drive: Using Binocular Visual Fields to Predict a Milestone to Blindness Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2449 - 2455. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. G. Strouthidis, A. Scott, A. C. Viswanathan, D. P. Crabb, and D. F. Garway-Heath Monitoring Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression: The Effect of a Novel Spatial Filter Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 251 - 257. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Vesti, C. A. Johnson, and B. C. Chauhan Comparison of Different Methods for Detecting Glaucomatous Visual Field Progression Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2003; 44(9): 3873 - 3879. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]