BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Elder, M J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Elder, M J
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:620-622
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Predicting the refractive outcome after cataract surgery: the comparison of different IOLs and SRK-II v SRK-T

M J Elder

Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Associate Professor Mark Elder, Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch Hospital, PO Box 4710, Christchurch, New Zealand


ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine any differences between the predictive abilities of the IOL calculation formulas of SRK-II and SRK-T and to compare these using two different IOL types.

Methods: A prospective, consecutive, single surgeon clinical trial was conducted on 400 consecutive patients who received routine, standardised phacoemulsification cataract surgery. 200 had cataract surgery and had the Alcon MZ30BD, a 5.5 mm one piece PMMA IOL, and another 200 cases used the Chiron C11UB, a silicone plate haptic IOL. The data used optimised A-constants. The measures were preoperative axial length and keratometry, IOL implanted, and refractive error at 4–6 weeks postoperatively.

Results: There was no significant difference between the predictive abilities of SRK-II or SRK-T. For the Alcon and Chiron lens respectively, prediction errors using SRK-II were <0.5 dioptres in 58% and 70% and for <1.0 dioptres in 84% and 92%. These differences were statistically significant ({chi}2, p=0.02).

Conclusion: There are differences in the predictability of refractive outcomes between intraocular lens styles.


Keywords: refractive outcome; cataract surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
J. R. Lewis, A. E. Knellinger, A. M. Mahmoud, and T. F. Mauger
Effect of Soft Contact Lenses on Optical Measurements of Axial Length and Keratometry for Biometry in Eyes with Corneal Irregularities
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2008; 49(8): 3371 - 3378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.