|
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||
|
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology
Predicting the refractive outcome after cataract surgery: the comparison of different IOLs and SRK-II v SRK-TM J Elder
Department of Ophthalmology, Christchurch School of Medicine, University of Otago
Correspondence to:
Methods: A prospective, consecutive, single surgeon clinical trial was conducted on 400 consecutive patients who received routine, standardised phacoemulsification cataract surgery. 200 had cataract surgery and had the Alcon MZ30BD, a 5.5 mm one piece PMMA IOL, and another 200 cases used the Chiron C11UB, a silicone plate haptic IOL. The data used optimised A-constants. The measures were preoperative axial length and keratometry, IOL implanted, and refractive error at 46 weeks postoperatively.
Results: There was no significant difference between the predictive abilities of SRK-II or SRK-T. For the Alcon and Chiron lens respectively, prediction errors using SRK-II were <0.5 dioptres in 58% and 70% and for <1.0 dioptres in 84% and 92%. These differences were statistically significant ( Conclusion: There are differences in the predictability of refractive outcomes between intraocular lens styles.
Keywords: refractive outcome; cataract surgery This article has been cited by other articles:
|
||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS | REGISTER |