BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Culham, L E
Right arrow Articles by Bird, A C
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Culham, L E
Right arrow Articles by Bird, A C
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:743-747
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Low vision services for vision rehabilitation in the United Kingdom

L E Culham1,2, B Ryan3, A J Jackson4, A R Hill5, B Jones6, C Miles1, J A Young7, C Bunce2, A C Bird1,2

1 Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
2 Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
3 The Royal National Institute for the Blind, London, UK
4 The Royal Victoria Hospital/Queens University, Belfast, University of Ulster, UK
5 Oxford Eye Hospital/Oxford University, Oxford, UK
6 Independent service user
7 Edinburgh College of Art/Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Louise Culham, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK;
louise.culham{at}moorfields.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Aim: Little is known about the distribution and methods of delivery of low vision services across the United Kingdom. The purpose of this study was to determine the type and location of low vision services within the UK.

Methods: Survey by means of a 29 point postal questionnaire, followed when necessary by a five point telephone questionnaire. All known potential providers of low vision services (n = 2539) including hospitals (n = 277), optician/optometry practices (n = 1683), social services (n = 177), voluntary groups (n = 190), specialist teachers (n = 205), and universities (n = 6) were surveyed. For each service provider, the type, magnitude, and geographical location were determined. The distribution of services across the United Kingdom and the ratio of providers to population density of people with a visual impairment were mapped using the Geographic Information System (GIS).

Results: Data were obtained on 1945 (77%) service providers: 1679 (66%) responded to the postal questionnaire and 266 (11%) to the telephone questionnaire. Of all respondents, 59% (n = 1135) offer some form of help to people with a visual disability, of which 26% (n = 497) only sell magnifiers and 33% (n = 638) provide low vision services. It is estimated that in total just under 155 000 low vision consultations are offered annually, the bulk of which are provided by hospital eye departments. The distribution was geographically uneven and there appears to be scarcity in some areas.

Conclusion: When compared to the probable number of people with a visual impairment in the UK there are apparent inadequacies in service provision in terms of distribution, magnitude, and coordination. The results highlight a need to review current services.


Keywords: low vision service provision; rehabilitation; visual impairment


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002 86: 709. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. P. Shah, H. Minto, M. Z. Jadoon, R. R. A. Bourne, B. Dineen, C. E. Gilbert, M. D. Khan, and on behalf of the Pakistan National Eye Survey Stud
Prevalence and Causes of Functional Low Vision and Implications for Services: The Pakistan National Blindness and Visual Impairment Survey
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2008; 49(3): 887 - 893.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J B Hassell, E L Lamoureux, and J E Keeffe
Impact of age related macular degeneration on quality of life
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 593 - 596.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
B C Reeves, R A Harper, and W B Russell
Enhanced low vision rehabilitation for people with age related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled trial
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2004; 88(11): 1443 - 1449.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Hinds, A Sinclair, J Park, A Suttie, H Paterson, and M Macdonald
Impact of an interdisciplinary low vision service on the quality of life of low vision patients
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2003; 87(11): 1391 - 1396.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.