BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gaudio, P A
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, T E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gaudio, P A
Right arrow Articles by Hughes, T E
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:755-760
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


CLINICAL SCIENCE

Polymerase chain reaction based detection of fungi in infected corneas

P A Gaudio1,*, U Gopinathan2, V Sangwan2, T E Hughes1

1 Yale Eye Center, New Haven, CT, USA
2 LV Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, India

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Thomas E Hughes, PhD, Yale Eye Center, 330 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06520, USA;
thomas.hughes{at}yale.edu

Aims: To evaluate a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay to detect fungi in scrapings from infected corneas.

Methods: A PCR assay was developed to amplify a portion of the fungal 18S ribosome gene. Corneal scrapings from 30 patients with presumed infectious keratitis were evaluated using this assay, as well as by standard microbiological techniques, and the results were compared. Conjunctival swabs from each patient's healthy, fellow eye were also evaluated by PCR.

Results: PCR and fungal culture results matched (were both positive or both negative for fungi) in 22 (74%) of 30 scrapings from infected corneas. Three (10%) of 30 samples were PCR positive but fungal culture negative; two of these appeared clinically to represent fungal infections, and the third was clinically indeterminate. Four (13%) scrapings were positive by PCR but also by bacterial and not fungal culture. One specimen (3%) was PCR negative but fungal culture positive. Of the conjunctival swabs from each patient's healthy fellow eye, five (17%) of 30 were positive by PCR, and the opposite, infected eye of all five of these harboured a fungal infection.

Conclusions: PCR is promising as a means to diagnose fungal keratitis and offers some advantages over culture methods, including rapid analysis and the ability to analyse specimens far from where they are collected.


Keywords: molecular diagnostics; India; keratomycosis; field studies




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. Vengayil, A. Panda, G. Satpathy, N. Nayak, S. Ghose, D. Patanaik, and S. Khokhar
Polymerase Chain Reaction-Guided Diagnosis of Mycotic Keratitis: A Prospective Evaluation of Its Efficacy and Limitations
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 152 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M J Bharathi, R Ramakrishnan, R Meenakshi, S Mittal, C Shivakumar, and M Srinivasan
Microbiological diagnosis of infective keratitis: comparative evaluation of direct microscopy and culture results
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1271 - 1276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Microbiol. Rev.Home page
P. A. Thomas
Current Perspectives on Ophthalmic Mycoses
Clin. Microbiol. Rev., October 1, 2003; 16(4): 730 - 797.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
Molecular diagnosis may help management of ocular infection
J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2002; 55(9): 720 - 720.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.