BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M K
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J H
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, M K
Right arrow Articles by Lee, J H
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:809-814
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


LABORATORY SCIENCE

Comparative experiments for in vivo fibroplasia and biological stability of four porous polymers intended for use in the Seoul-type keratoprosthesis

M K Kim1, J L Lee2, W R Wee3, J H Lee3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
2 Department of Ophthalmology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Taejon, Korea
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine and the Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Center, Seoul, Korea

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr Won Ryang Wee, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, #28 Yongon-dong, Chongno-gu, Seoul 110-744, Korea;
wrwee{at}snu.ac.kr

Aims: To evaluate in vivo fibroplasia and biological stability of porous polymers intended for use in the Seoul-type keratoprosthesis (S-KPro).

Methods: Four porous polymers (polypropylene, two kinds of polyethylene terephthalate (PE70 and PE50), and polyurethane) were investigated. Discs of polymers were inserted into the corneal stroma of rabbits for a 2 and 5 month period. Corneal oedema and neovascularisation were evaluated. The fibroplasia and collagen deposition were examined under light and transmission electron microscopy. S-KPros, whose skirt was made of four types of polymer, were implanted into the rabbits' eyes. The retention time and complications were evaluated.

Results: Neovascularisation and corneal oedema were found in all of the disc inserted eyes, but the corneal oedema subsided within 2 months in most of the eyes. The mean number of fibroblasts increased significantly in polypropylene and PE50 disc inserted eyes compared with polyurethane disc inserted eyes. Plentiful collagen deposition was also found in both polypropylene and PE50 disc inserted eyes. Mean retention time in the polypropylene SK-Pro implanted eyes was longer than that of the other eyes (20.7 weeks). The PE70 skirt induced corneal melting around the prosthesis.

Conclusion: Polypropylene encourages fibroblast ingrowth and shows good biological stability when used as a skirt material in S-KPro.


Keywords: polypropylene; fibroplasia; Seoul-type keratoprosthesis; porous polymers




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S.-M. Lee, M.-K. Kim, J. Y. Oh, J.-W. Heo, M.-S. Shin, M.-S. Lee, W.-R. Wee, and J.-H. Lee
Endoscopic Vitrectomy Improves Outcomes of Seoul-type Keratoprosthesis Exchange in Rabbit Model
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., October 1, 2008; 49(10): 4407 - 4411.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S Shimmura, H Miyashita, Y Uchino, T Taguchi, H Kobayashi, J Shimazaki, J Tanaka, and K Tsubota
Microkeratome assisted deep lamellar keratoprosthesis
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2006; 90(7): 826 - 829.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.