This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tejeria, L Articles by Dickinson, C M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tejeria, L Articles by Dickinson, C M

Face recognition in age related macular degeneration: perceived disability, measured disability, and performance with a bioptic device

¹ Research Group in Eye and Vision Science, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WH, UK
² Department of Optometry and Neuroscience, UMIST, PO Box 88, Manchester M60 1QD, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R Harper, Research Group in Eye and Vision Science, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9WH, UK;
robert.harper{at}man.ac.uk

Aims: (1) To explore the relation between performance on tasks of familiar face recognition (FFR) and face expression difference discrimination (FED) with both perceived disability in face recognition and clinical measures of visual function in subjects with age related macular degeneration (AMD). (2) To quantify the gain in performance for face recognition tasks when subjects use a bioptic telescopic low vision device.

Methods: 30 subjects with AMD (age range 66–90 years; visual acuity 0.4–1.4 logMAR) were recruited for the study. Perceived (self rated) disability in face recognition was assessed by an eight item questionnaire covering a range of issues relating to face recognition. Visual functions measured were distance visual acuity (ETDRS logMAR charts), continuous text reading acuity (MNRead charts), contrast sensitivity (Pelli-Robson chart), and colour vision (large panel D-15). In the FFR task, images of famous people had to be identified. FED was assessed by a forced choice test where subjects had to decide which one of four images showed a different facial expression. These tasks were repeated with subjects using a bioptic device.

Results: Overall perceived disability in face recognition did not correlate with performance on either task, although a specific item on difficulty recognising familiar faces did correlate with FFR (r = 0.49, p<0.05). FFR performance was most closely related to distance acuity (r = -0.69, p<0.001), while FED performance was most closely related to continuous text reading acuity (r = -0.79, p<0.001). In multiple regression, neither contrast sensitivity nor colour vision significantly increased the explained variance. When using a bioptic telescope, FFR performance improved in 86% of subjects (median gain = 49%; p<0.001), while FED performance increased in 79% of subjects (median gain = 50%; p<0.01).

Conclusion: Distance and reading visual acuity are closely associated with measured task performance in FFR and FED. A bioptic low vision device can offer a significant improvement in performance for face recognition tasks, and may be useful in reducing the handicap associated with this disability. There is, however, little evidence for a correlation between self rated difficulty in face recognition and measured performance for either task. Further work is needed to explore the complex relation between the perception of disability and measured performance.

Keywords: face recognition; disability; age related macular degeneration; telescope

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Virgili, C. Cordaro, A. Bigoni, S. Crovato, P. Cecchini, and U. Menchini Reading Acuity in Children: Evaluation and Reliability Using MNREAD Charts Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2004; 45(9): 3349 - 3354. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]