BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Alwitry, A
Right arrow Articles by Holden, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Alwitry, A
Right arrow Articles by Holden, R
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:975-977
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

The use of surgical facemasks during cataract surgery: is it necessary?

A Alwitry1, E Jackson2, H Chen1, R Holden1

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Derbyshire Royal Infirmary, Derby DE1 2QY, UK
2 Department of Microbiology

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr A Alwitry, Department of Ophthalmology, Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat Centre, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK;
DocAmar{at}aol.com


ABSTRACT
Aim: To assess whether facemask utilisation by the surgeon during cataract surgery has any effect on the bacterial load falling onto the operative site.

Method: Prospective randomised masked study. Consent was obtained from 221 patients. Cases were randomised to wearing a new mask or not wearing any mask throughout the procedure. Blood agar settle plates were placed adjacent to the patient's head in the operative field. Duration of procedure was noted. Plates were incubated and read at 48 hours. Colony forming bacteria were counted and identified.

Results: There were significantly fewer organisms cultured when the surgeon used a facemask (p=0.0006). The majority of organisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis, Bacillus spp, and Diphtheroid spp; however Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were cultured on several occasions. There were no cases of infective complication.

Conclusions: The main purpose of an operating mask is to prevent bacteria falling on to the operative site from the surgeon's oropharynx or nasopharynx with the concomitant theoretical risk of infective complication. Operating masks were shown to have a significant effect on the volume of bacterial organisms falling to the operative site; however, whether this is clinically significant is unknown.


Keywords: surgical facemasks; cataract surgery


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2002 86: 945. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P K Nirmalan, P Lalitha, and V N Prajna
Can antiseptic scrubs between cataract surgeries reduce bacterial load on surgical gloves to safe levels?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., March 1, 2004; 88(3): 438 - 439.
[Full Text]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
D. Kamming, M. Gardam, and F. Chung
I. Anaesthesia and SARS
Br. J. Anaesth., June 1, 2003; 90(6): 715 - 718.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

The use of surgical facemasks during cataract surgery
Amit Patel, et al.
BJO Online, 16 Apr 2003 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.