BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kroese, M
Right arrow Articles by McCarter, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kroese, M
Right arrow Articles by McCarter, D
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2002;86:978-980
© 2002 British Journal of Ophthalmology


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma in general ophthalmic practice in the United Kingdom

M Kroese1, H Burton2, S Vardy3, T Rimmer3, D McCarter3

1 Eastern Region Public Health Observatory, Institute of Public Health, Box 113, University Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge, CB2 2SR, UK
2 Public Health Genetics Unit, Strangeways Reasearch Laboratory, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Peterborough District Hospital, Thorpe Road, Peterborough PE3 6DA, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mark Kroese


ABSTRACT
Aim: To estimate the predicted prevalence of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) from the activity of a local ophthalmology department.

Method: Using clinic audit data, the local incidence and prevalence of POAG in the registered population of two primary care trusts were calculated.

Results: The local derived prevalence estimate for POAG was 978 per 100 000 people aged 40–89 years (95% CI 753 to 1272) compared with the expected prevalence from a published model of 1230 people per 100 000 people aged 40–89 years.

Conclusion: The derived prevalence was not statistically significantly different from that predicted. Based on the published evidence that about half of the POAG cases are undetected, it would have been expected that local audit figures would have yielded figures about 50% lower than the epidemiological model. The main reason for this higher prevalence is thought to be differences in the diagnostic criteria used. This lack of consensus on the case definition for POAG is a deficit, which will hamper future needs assessment.


Keywords: primary open angle glaucoma; needs assessment




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C G Owen, I M Carey, S De Wilde, P H Whincup, R Wormald, and D G Cook
The epidemiology of medical treatment for glaucoma and ocular hypertension in the United Kingdom: 1994 to 2003
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2006; 90(7): 861 - 868.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
M Kroese and H Burton
Primary open angle glaucoma. The need for a consensus case definition
J Epidemiol Community Health, September 1, 2003; 57(9): 752 - 754.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2002 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.