This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tsirbas, A Articles by Wormald, P J Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tsirbas, A Articles by Wormald, P J

Mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with mucosal flaps

¹ Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre and Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia
² Department of Surgery-Otorhinolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital and Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr A Tsirbas, Department of Ophthalmology, Flinders Medical Centre, Beford Park, SA 5042, Australia;
Ophthalmology{at}fmc.sa.gov.au

ABSTRACT
Aims: To describe and assess the efficacy of mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (MENDCR). This is a new technique that involves creation of a large rhinostomy and mucosal flaps. The study involved a prospective non-randomised interventional case series with short perioperative follow up.

Method: A prospective series of 104 consecutive endonasal DCRs performed from January 1999 to December 2001 were entered into the study. Patients included in the study had nasolacrimal duct obstruction and had not had previous lacrimal surgery. The technique involved anastomosis of nasal mucosal and lacrimal sac flaps and a large bony ostium. Surgery was performed by two surgeons (AT/PJW). Follow up assessment included nasoendoscopy as well as symptom evaluation. Success was defined as anatomical patency with fluorescein flow on nasoendoscopy and patency to lacrimal syringing. The average follow up time was 9.7 months (range 2–28, SD 6.7 months).

Results: There were 104 DCRs performed on 86 patients (30 male, 56 female). The average age of the patients was 59 years (range 3–89, SD 24.1 years). Common presentations were epiphora (77%) and/or mucocele (19%). Septoplasty (SMR) was required in 48 DCRs (46%) and 13 DCRs (12.5%) needed other endoscopic surgery in conjunction with the lacrimal surgery. The surgery was successful in 93 cases (89%). Of the 11 cases that were classified as a failure six patients was anatomically patent but still symptomatic and another two had preoperative canalicular problems. The anatomical patency with this new technique was thus 95% (99 of 104 DCRs).

Conclusion: MENDCR involves creation of a large ostium and mucosal preservation for the construction of flaps. The anatomical success is 95% and is similar to external DCR and better then other endonasal approaches. The authors suggest that creation of a large ostium as well as mucosal flaps improves the efficacy of this endonasal technique.

Keywords: mechanical endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (MENDCR); mucosal flaps; otodrill

This article has been cited by other articles:

				L M Cheung, I C Francis, F Stapleton, and G Wilcsek Symptom assessment in patients with functional and primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction before and after successful dacryocystorhinostomy surgery: a prospective study Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1671 - 1674. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J M Olver The success rates for endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2003; 87(11): 1431 - 1431. [Full Text]