BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J M
Right arrow Articles by Mulvahil, A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wood, J M
Right arrow Articles by Mulvahil, A
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:1387-1390
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

Pupil dilatation does affect some aspects of daytime driving performance

J M Wood, D Garth, G Grounds, P McKay, A Mulvahil

Centre for Eye Research, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Joanne M Wood
Centre for Eye Research, School of Optometry, Queensland University of Technology, Victoria Park Road, Kelvin Grove, Brisbane Q4059, Australia; j.wood{at}qut.edu.au

Aims: To examine the effects of pupil dilatation on driving performance and determine whether this was related to changes in standard measures of visual function.

Methods: The driving and vision performance of 16 young, visually normal participants was measured with both normal and dilated pupils. Pupils were dilated with 1% tropicamide. Driving performance was measured under daytime conditions on a closed road circuit that was free of other vehicles and has been used in previous studies of driving performance. Measures included road sign detection and recognition, hazard detection and avoidance, gap perception and negotiation, driving reaction times and time to complete the circuit. Visual performance measures included high contrast visual acuity, Pelli-Robson letter contrast sensitivity, and glare sensitivity.

Results: Pupil dilatation significantly (p<0.05) decreased the ability of participants to recognise low contrast hazards and avoid them, decreased their visual acuity and contrast sensitivity and increased glare sensitivity. The decreases in vision performance were not, however, significantly related to the decrement in driving performance.

Conclusion: Pupil dilatation can impair selected aspects of driving and vision performance and patients should be cautioned about these possible effects.


Keywords: dilated pupils; driving assessment; visual function




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J M Wood and T P Carberry
Bilateral cataract surgery and driving performance
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2006; 90(10): 1277 - 1280.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics SocietyHome page
T. Ueda, Y. Nawa, E. Yukawa, F. Taketani, and Y. Hara
Change in Dynamic Visual Acuity (DVA) by Pupil Dilation
Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, January 1, 2006; 48(4): 651 - 655.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J Siderov, D Mehta, and R Virk
The legal requirement for driving in the United Kingdom is met following pupil dilatation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2005; 89(10): 1379 - 1380.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
Minerva
BMJ, November 22, 2003; 327(7425): 1236 - 1236.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.