This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hunt, O A Articles by Gilmartin, B Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hunt, O A Articles by Gilmartin, B

Evaluation of the measurement of refractive error by the PowerRefractor: a remote, continuous and binocular measurement system of oculomotor function

Neurosciences Research Institute, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J S Wolffsohn
School of Life and Health Sciences, Optometry, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; j.s.w.wolffsohn{at}aston.ac.uk

Background/aim: The technique of photoretinoscopy is unique in being able to measure the dynamics of the oculomotor system (ocular accommodation, vergence, and pupil size) remotely (working distance typically 1 metre) and objectively in both eyes simultaneously. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinically the measurement of refractive error by a recent commercial photoretinoscopic device, the PowerRefractor (PlusOptiX, Germany).

Method: The validity and repeatability of the PowerRefractor was compared to: subjective (non-cycloplegic) refraction on 100 adult subjects (mean age 23.8 (SD 5.7) years) and objective autorefraction (Shin-Nippon SRW-5000, Japan) on 150 subjects (20.1 (4.2) years). Repeatability was assessed by examining the differences between autorefractor readings taken from each eye and by re-measuring the objective prescription of 100 eyes at a subsequent session.

Results: On average the PowerRefractor prescription was not significantly different from the subjective refraction, although quite variable (difference +0.05 (0.63) D, p = 0.41) and more negative than the SRW-5000 prescription (by -0.20 (0.72) D, p<0.001). There was no significant bias in the accuracy of the instrument with regard to the type or magnitude of refractive error. The PowerRefractor was found to be repeatable over the prescription range of -8.75D to +4.00D (mean spherical equivalent) examined.

Conclusion: The PowerRefractor is a useful objective screening instrument and because of its remote and rapid measurement of both eyes simultaneously is able to assess the oculomotor response in a variety of unrestricted viewing conditions and patient types.

Keywords: autorefractor; photoretinoscopy

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. M. Tondel and T. R. Candy Human Infants' Accommodation Responses to Dynamic Stimuli Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., February 1, 2007; 48(2): 949 - 956. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. S. Wolffsohn, O. A. Hunt, S. Naroo, B. Gilmartin, S. Shah, I. A. Cunliffe, M. T. Benson, and S. Mantry Objective Accommodative Amplitude and Dynamics with the 1CU Accommodative Intraocular Lens. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1230 - 1235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Kasthurirangan and A. Glasser Influence of Amplitude and Starting Point on Accommodative Dynamics in Humans Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2005; 46(9): 3463 - 3472. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]