BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panchapakesan, J
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, R G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panchapakesan, J
Right arrow Articles by Cumming, R G
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:168-172
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


CLINICAL SCIENCE

Five year incidence of cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study

J Panchapakesan1, P Mitchell1, K Tumuluri1, E Rochtchina1, S Foran1, R G Cumming2

1 Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Australia
2 Department of Public Health and Community Medicine

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Paul Mitchell, University of Sydney Department of Ophthalmology (Centre for Vision Research), Westmead Hospital, Hawkesbury Road, Westmead, NSW 2145 Australia;
paulmi{at}westgate.wh.usyd.edu.au

Aims: To assess the 5 year incidence of cataract surgery in an older population based prospective cohort.

Methods: 5 Year prospective follow up of the population based Blue Mountains Eye Study (BMES) performed in 1992. The follow up study examined 2335 survivors (75.1%) of the 3654 baseline participants. Baseline and 5 year slit lamp and retroillumination lens photographs were graded for presence of cortical, nuclear, or posterior subcapsular cataract using the Wisconsin cataract grading method and cataract surgery was documented from the history and the clinical examination.

Results: An overall cataract surgery rate of 5.7% in first or both eyes was documented. The incidence was 0.3% in people aged 49–54 years at baseline, 1.7% for ages 55–64 years, 7.9% for ages 65 to 74 years, and 17.4% in people aged 75 years or older. The rate of surgery in first or both eyes was 6.0% in women and 5.2% in men, age adjusted p = 0.66. Bilateral cataract surgery was performed during follow up on 2.7% of participants, while 43.1% of unilateral phakic cases had second eye surgery. Presence of any posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataract, either alone or in combination with other cataract types, was the most likely type of cataract at baseline to be associated with incident cataract surgery. Baseline age was the most important non-ocular variable predicting incident cataract surgery.

Conclusions: This study has documented age specific rates for 5 year incident cataract surgery in an older community. The finding of relatively similar incidence rates and ocular predictors of cataract surgery to those reported by the Beaver Dam Eye Study, Wisconsin, United States, is of interest, given previous documented similarities between these two populations.


Keywords: cataract; cataract surgery; Blue Mountains Eye Study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
A. Williams, F. A. Sloan, and P. P. Lee
Longitudinal rates of cataract surgery.
Arch Ophthalmol, September 1, 2006; 124(9): 1308 - 1314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
M. Taban, A. Behrens, R. L. Newcomb, M. Y. Nobe, G. Saedi, P. M. Sweet, and P. J. McDonnell
Acute Endophthalmitis Following Cataract Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2005; 123(5): 613 - 620.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Lewis, N Congdon, B Munoz, H Bowie, H Lai, P Chen, and S K West
Cataract surgery and subtype in a defined, older population: the SEECAT Project
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2004; 88(12): 1512 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.