BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Medeiros, F A
Right arrow Articles by Susanna, R
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Medeiros, F A
Right arrow Articles by Susanna, R, Jr
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:413-419
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group


SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

Comparison of algorithms for detection of localised nerve fibre layer defects using scanning laser polarimetry

F A Medeiros, R Susanna, Jr

Department of Ophthalmology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Felipe A Medeiros, MD, 5350 Toscana Way No E-111, San Diego, CA 92122, USA;
fmedeiros{at}uol.com.br


ABSTRACT
Aims: To evaluate different algorithms used to analyse retinal nerve fibre layer thickness (RNFL) data obtained by scanning laser polarimetry, in order to compare their relative abilities to discriminate between patients with glaucomatous localised nerve fibre layer defects and normal subjects.

Methods: 48 eyes of 48 glaucomatous patients with localised RNFL defects and 53 eyes of 53 healthy subjects were included in this study. The localised RNFL defects were identified by RNFL photography and/or slit lamp biomicroscopic examination. All patients were submitted to RNFL examination using scanning laser polarimetry (GDx nerve fibre analyser, Laser Diagnostic Technologies, Inc, San Diego, CA, USA). Three methods of analysis of polarimetry data were used: GDx software provided parameters; RNFL thickness measurements in 16 equal sectors around the optic disc (sectoral analysis); and Fourier analysis of the curve of distribution of RNFL thickness measurements. Linear discriminant functions were developed to assess sensitivity and specificity of the sectoral based analysis and Fourier analysis and were compared to the GDx parameters. In addition, areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were compared.

Results: At a fixed specificity of 91%, the sensitivity of the linear discriminant function from sectoral data (LDF sectoral) was 81%, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93. The linear discriminant function from Fourier measures had a comparable performance, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.93, and sensitivity of 71% for specificity at 91%. At the same specificity, the sensitivities of the GDx software provided parameters ranged from 15% to 40%. The areas under the ROC curves for the LDF sectoral and LDF Fourier were significantly greater than the ROC curve area for the single best GDx parameter.

Conclusion: The sectoral based analysis and the Fourier analysis of RNFL polarimetry data resulted in an improved detection of eyes with glaucomatous localised nerve fibre layer defects compared to the GDx software provided parameters.


Keywords: algorithms; nerve fibre layer; scanning laser polarimetry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
Z. Burgansky-Eliash, G. Wollstein, T. Chu, J. D. Ramsey, C. Glymour, R. J. Noecker, H. Ishikawa, and J. S. Schuman
Optical Coherence Tomography Machine Learning Classifiers for Glaucoma Detection: A Preliminary Study
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2005; 46(11): 4147 - 4152.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. A. Essock, Y. Zheng, and P. Gunvant
Analysis of GDx-VCC Polarimetry Data by Wavelet-Fourier Analysis across Glaucoma Stages
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., August 1, 2005; 46(8): 2838 - 2847.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Bowd, F. A. Medeiros, Z. Zhang, L. M. Zangwill, J. Hao, T.-W. Lee, T. J. Sejnowski, R. N. Weinreb, and M. H. Goldbaum
Relevance Vector Machine and Support Vector Machine Classifier Analysis of Scanning Laser Polarimetry Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer Measurements
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2005; 46(4): 1322 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
F. A. Medeiros, L. M. Zangwill, C. Bowd, and R. N. Weinreb
Comparison of the GDx VCC Scanning Laser Polarimeter, HRT II Confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope, and Stratus OCT Optical Coherence Tomograph for the Detection of Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2004; 122(6): 827 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.