BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER


[Advanced]
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morlet, N
Right arrow Articles by Ng, J
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morlet, N
Right arrow Articles by Ng, J
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2003;87:574-576
© 2003 BMJ Publishing Group

SCIENTIFIC CORRESPONDENCE

The Endophthalmitis Population Study of Western Australia (EPSWA): first report

N Morlet1, J Li2, J Semmens2, J Ng2 on behalf of team EPSWA

1 Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia
2 School of Population Health, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Nigel Morlet, 5/592 Stirling Highway, Mosman Park, WA, Australia 6012


ABSTRACT
Background/aim: Over the period of 19 years to 1999, cataract surgery numbers increased 6% per annum in Western Australia (WA), promoted by the convenience, efficacy, and general safety of outpatient phacoemulsification surgery. Although endophthalmitis is an uncommon complication, it is a major cause of post-cataract surgery blindness. The present population study investigates not only the prevalence of endophthalmitis but provides an accurate incidence of endophthalmitis in WA over the same period.

Methods: Using the hospital morbidity data system (HMDS) of the WA Record Linkage Project, and cross validating against three independent databases (anaesthetic and microbiological databases and surgeons’ logbooks) the authors examined 698 case notes that were potentially cases of endophthalmitis for the period 1980 to June 1999. As the database linkage was incomplete for 1999, only the 188 confirmed cases to 1998 were included in the present study. Additional case note validation was performed to confirm the correct codes for the cataract surgical procedure.

Results: Despite changes in surgical technique and prophylaxis over the study period of 19 years, the incidence of endophthalmitis remained largely unchanged, averaging one in 500 surgical cases overall. However, the incidence fluctuated over time and varied with the location of surgery ranging from 0.65 per 1000 operations to 16.4 per 1000 operations.

Conclusion: These data highlight previously undescribed temporal and geographic variations in the incidence of endophthalmitis. It is uncertain whether the wide variation in prophylactic practices throughout the ophthalmic community has any bearing on the incidence of endophthalmitis.

Keywords: endophthalmitis; cataract surgery; epidemiology; population study




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
C. C Murphy, S. Nicholson, S. A. Quah, M. Batterbury, T. Neal, and S. B Kaye
Pharmacokinetics of vancomycin following intracameral bolus injection in patients undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2007; 91(10): 1350 - 1353.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. Li, N. Morlet, J. Q. Ng, J. B. Semmens, and M. W. Knuiman
Significant Nonsurgical Risk Factors for Endophthalmitis after Cataract Surgery: EPSWA Fourth Report
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2004; 45(5): 1321 - 1328.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2003 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.