BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, R J C
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bowman, R J C
Right arrow Articles by Harper, J I
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004;88:1419-1421
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SCIENTIFIC REPORT

An ultrasound based classification of periocular haemangiomas

R J C Bowman1, K K Nischal1, K Patel2, J I Harper3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
2 Department of Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK
3 Department of Dermatology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Mr K K Nischal
Consultant Ophthalmologist, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, Great Ormond Street, London WC1N 3JH, UK; kkn{at}btinternet.com


ABSTRACT
Aims: To propose a classification system for periocular haemangiomas based on ultrasound evaluation.

Methods: Retrospective review of ultrasound images from children seen in the authors’ unit with periocular haemangiomas. Static ultrasound images from 50 patients with periocular haemangiomas were reviewed as identified from a computerised database. Each haemangioma ultrasound image was classified into three categories: (1) preseptal only; (2) preseptal + extraconal; (3) preseptal + extraconal + intraconal. These were compared with the categories given to each patient at first presentation after dynamic scanning.

Results: Classification was possible from the static images in 44 (88%) cases. Of those classified 20 (45%) were preseptal only; 17 (39%) were preseptal + extraconal, and seven (16%) had an additional intraconal component. The classification in all 44 cases was the same as that given at the time of presentation. In the small number of cases which went to surgery or had neuroimaging, the ultrasound classification was confirmed.

Conclusions: Ultrasound classification was not difficult to perform and no child needed sedation or general anaesthesia for this exam. Ultrasound anatomical classification is an important first step in determining appropriate treatment of periocular haemangiomas. The authors present what they believe to be the first such classification.


Keywords: classification; periocular haemangioma; ultrasound


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2004 88: 1357. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]






HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.