BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koranyi, G
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, E D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koranyi, G
Right arrow Articles by Kopp, E D
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2004;88:911-914
© 2004 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

Cut and paste: a no suture, small incision approach to pterygium surgery

G Koranyi, S Seregard, E D Kopp

St Erik’s Eye Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Gabor Koranyi MD
St Erik’s Eye Hospital, 112 82 Stockholm, Sweden; gabor.koranyi{at}sankterik.se

Aim: Evaluation of the benefits of a new technique for pterygium surgery with respect to postoperative pain and surgery time.

Methods: A prospective randomised clinical trial was carried out in 43 patients. 43 eyes were operated for primary nasal pterygium. Autologous conjunctival graft taken at the superotemporal limbus was used to cover the sclera after pterygium excision. After randomisation, in 20 patients the transplant was attached to the sclera with a fibrin tissue adhesive (Tisseel Duo Quick) and in 23 patients with absorbable sutures (7–0 Vicryl Rapid). The Mann-Whitney test was used as statistical analysis. Postoperative pain was graded according to the visual analogue scale (VAS) twice daily during the first week after surgery. Surgery time was noted from the first incision until the lid speculum was removed.

Results: The average pain was significantly lower when glue had been used, p<0.05. Average surgery time was 9.7 minutes (range 6–13) for glue and 18.5 minutes (range 12–30) for sutures, p<0.001. No complications occurred.

Conclusion: Using glue instead of sutures when attaching the conjunctival transplant in pterygium surgery causes significantly less postoperative pain and shortens surgery time significantly.


Keywords: no suture; small incision approach to pterygium surgery




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A Karalezli, C Kucukerdonmez, Y A Akova, R Altan-Yaycioglu, and M Borazan
Fibrin glue versus sutures for conjunctival autografting in pterygium surgery: a prospective comparative study
Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2008; 92(9): 1206 - 1210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. Sekiyama, T. Nakamura, E. Kurihara, L. J. Cooper, N. J. Fullwood, M. Takaoka, J. Hamuro, and S. Kinoshita
Novel Sutureless Transplantation of Bioadhesive-Coated, Freeze-Dried Amniotic Membrane for Ocular Surface Reconstruction
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1528 - 1534.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P Luanratanakorn, T Ratanapakorn, O Suwan-apichon, and R S Chuck
Randomised controlled study of conjunctival autograft versus amniotic membrane graft in pterygium excision
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2006; 90(12): 1476 - 1480.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Comments on using fibrin glue in pterygium surgery
Lenio S Alvarenga
BJO Online, 13 Jul 2004 [Full text]
Authors' response
Gabor Koranyi
BJO Online, 11 Aug 2004 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2004 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.