This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Reinhard, J Articles by Trauzettel-Klosinski, S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Reinhard, J Articles by Trauzettel-Klosinski, S Topic Collections Relevant Articles

Does visual restitution training change absolute homonymous visual field defects? A fundus controlled study

¹ University Eye Hospital, Department of Pathophysiology of Vision and Neuro-Ophthalmology, Tübingen, Germany
² Institute of Medical Psychology, University of Magdeburg, Germany
³ Department of Medical Biometry, University of Tübingen, Germany

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Jens Reinhard MD MSc
University Eye Hospital, Schleichstrasse 12–16, 72076 Tübingen, Germany; jens.reinhard{at}med.uni-tuebingen.de

Aim: To examine whether visual restitution training (VRT) is able to change absolute homonymous field defect, assessed with fundus controlled microperimetry, in patients with hemianopia.

Methods: 17 patients with stable homonymous visual field defects before and after a 6 month VRT period were investigated with a specialised microperimetric method using a scanning laser ophthalmoscope (SLO). Fixation was controlled by SLO fundus monitoring. The size of the field defect was quantified by calculating the ratio of the number of absolute defects and the number of test points; the training effect E was defined as the difference between these two ratios before and after training. A shift of the entire vertical visual field border by 1° would result in an E value of 0.14.

Results: The mean training effect of all right eyes was E = 0.025 (SD 0.052) and all left eyes E = 0.008 (SD 0.034). In one eye, a slight non-homonymous improvement along the horizontal meridian occurred.

Conclusions: In one patient, a slight improvement along the horizontal meridian was found in one eye. In none of the patients was an explicit homonymous change of the absolute field defect border observed after training.

Abbreviations: HRP, high resolution perimetry; SLO, scanning laser ophthalmoscope; wpm, words per minute; VRT, visual restitution training

Keywords: hemianopia; training; scanning laser ophthalmoscope; visual restoration therapy; 270; 263

Relevant Articles

Disappointing results from Nova Vision’s visual restoration therapy

J C Horton
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1-2. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				F. Rowe, D. Brand, C. A. Jackson, A. Price, L. Walker, S. Harrison, C. Eccleston, C. Scott, N. Akerman, C. Dodridge, et al. Visual impairment following stroke: do stroke patients require vision assessment? Age Ageing, November 21, 2008; (2008) afn230v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. R. Bowers, K. Keeney, and E. Peli Community-Based Trial of a Peripheral Prism Visual Field Expansion Device for Hemianopia Arch Ophthalmol, May 1, 2008; 126(5): 657 - 664. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Bouwmeester, J. Heutink, and C. Lucas The effect of visual training for patients with visual field defects due to brain damage: a systematic review J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, June 1, 2007; 78(6): 555 - 564. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C. C. Glisson and S. L. Galetta Visual rehabilitation: Now you see it; now you don't Neurology, May 29, 2007; 68(22): 1881 - 1882. [Full Text] [PDF]

				A Raninen, S Vanni, L Hyvarinen, and R Nasanen Temporal sensitivity in a hemianopic visual field can be improved by long-term training using flicker stimulation J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, January 1, 2007; 78(1): 66 - 73. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. A. Jones and R. A. Shinton Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 560 - 565. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sahraie, C. T. Trevethan, M. J. MacLeod, A. D. Murray, J. A. Olson, and L. Weiskrantz Increased sensitivity after repeated stimulation of residual spatial channels in blindsight PNAS, October 3, 2006; 103(40): 14971 - 14976. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Schreiber, R. Vonthein, J. Reinhard, S. Trauzettel-Klosinski, C. Connert, and U. Schiefer Effect of visual restitution training on absolute homonymous scotomas. Neurology, July 11, 2006; 67(1): 143 - 145. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. A Sabel Vision restoration therapy and raising red flags too early Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2006; 90(5): 659 - 660. [Full Text] [PDF]

				L R Caplan, A Firlik, N J Newman, M Pless, J G Romano, and N Schatz Vision restoration therapy Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2005; 89(9): 1229 - 1229. [Full Text] [PDF]

				J C Horton Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2005; 89(7): 792 - 794. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B A Sabel, S Kenkel, and E Kasten Vision restoration therapy Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2005; 89(5): 522 - 524. [Full Text] [PDF]