BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R T
Right arrow Articles by Barbazetto, I
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, R T
Right arrow Articles by Barbazetto, I
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:87-91
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

A method of drusen measurement based on reconstruction of fundus background reflectance

R T Smith, J K Chan, T Nagasaki, J R Sparrow, I Barbazetto

Department of Ophthalmology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R T Smith
Harkness Eye Institute Columbia University College of Pysicians and Surgeons, New York, NY10032, USA; rts1{at}columbia.edu

Background: The hallmarks of age related macular degeneration (AMD) are the subretinal deposits known as drusen. Current manual methods of drusen segmentation and quantification are laborious and subjective. The authors introduced a digital method and tested it for accuracy and reliability.

Methods: Fourteen eyes with drusen were selected. The authors digitally reconstructed the macular background using normal background areas ("dots") fitted to quadratic polynomials in two zones. The model was used to level the reflectance for the purpose of segmenting drusen by a global threshold. Measurements of drusen areas were compared with those of a semi-automated background levelling technique and manual drawings from stereo pairs.

Results: Intraobserver reproducibility had standard deviations from 0.1% to 4.1%. Interobserver reproducibility yielded 95% limits of agreement of –2.7% to 6.3%. The dots method compared with manual drawings and with the semi-automated method had 95% limits of agreement of –8.3% to 2.8% and –7.1% to 4.8%, respectively.

Conclusions: The dots method was reproducible and accurate with respect to validated methods. It provided less total operating time and greater precision than that of standard fundus photo grading. With implementation of commercial software, this technique for macular image analysis has potential for use in clinical research.


Abbreviations: AMD, age related macular degeneration; CMGS, Columbia Macular Genetics Study

Keywords: age related macular degeneration; digital imaging; drusen; macula; quantification




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
R. T. Smith, J. K. Chan, M. Busuoic, V. Sivagnanavel, A. C. Bird, and N. V. Chong
Autofluorescence Characteristics of Early, Atrophic, and High-Risk Fellow Eyes in Age-Related Macular Degeneration
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5495 - 5504.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
R. T. Smith, J. K. Chan, T. Nagasaki, U. F. Ahmad, I. Barbazetto, J. Sparrow, M. Figueroa, and J. Merriam
Automated Detection of Macular Drusen Using Geometric Background Leveling and Threshold Selection
Arch Ophthalmol, February 1, 2005; 123(2): 200 - 206.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.