This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Read responses to this article Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Mehta, J S Articles by Allan, B D S Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Mehta, J S Articles by Allan, B D S

Hydroxyapatite promotes superior keratocyte adhesion and proliferation in comparison with current keratoprosthesis skirt materials

¹ Cornea & External Disease Service, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
² Division of Cell Biology, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
³ University of Brighton, School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Science, University of Brighton, Brighton, UK
⁴ IRC in Biomedical Materials, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrJ S Mehta
Moorfields Eye Hospital, City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; jodmehta{at}gmail.com

Aim: Published clinical series suggest the osteoodontokeratoprosthesis (OOKP) may have a lower extrusion rate than current synthetic keratoprostheses. The OOKP is anchored in the eye wall by autologous tooth. The authors’ aim was to compare adhesion, proliferation, and morphology for telomerase transformed keratocytes seeded on calcium hydroxyapatite (the principal mineral constituent of tooth) and materials used in the anchoring elements of commercially available synthetic keratoprostheses.

Methods: Test materials were hydroxyapatite, polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE), polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), and glass (control). Cell adhesion and viability were quantified at 4 hours, 24 hours, and 1 week using a calcein-AM/EthD-1 viability/cytotoxicity assay. Focal contact expression and cytoskeletal organisation were studied at 24 hours by confocal microscopy with immunoflourescent labelling. Further studies of cell morphology were performed using light and scanning electron microscopy.

Results: Live cell counts were significantly greater on hydroxyapatite surfaces at each time point (p<0.04). Dead cell counts were significantly higher for PTFE at 7 days (p<0.002). ß₁ integrin expression was highest on hydroxyapatite. Adhesion structures were well expressed in flat, spread out keratocytes on both HA and glass. Keratocytes tended to be thinner and spindle shaped on PTFE. The relatively few keratocytes visible on HEMA test surfaces were rounded and poorly adherent.

Conclusions: Keratocyte adhesion, spreading, and viability on hydroxyapatite test surfaces is superior to that seen on PTFE and HEMA. Improving the initial cell adhesion environment in the skirt element of keratoprostheses may enhance tissue integration and reduce device failure rates.

Abbreviations: BSA, bovine serum albumin; Ethd-1, ethidium homodimer-1; HEMA, polyhydroxyethyl methacrylate; OOKP, osteoodontokeratoprosthesis; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PTFE, polytetrafluoroethylene; PHEMA, poly(2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate)

Keywords: keratoprosthesis; osteoodontokeratoprosthesis; hydroxyapatite; polytetrafluoroethylene; PHEMA

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C Liu, S Okera, R Tandon, J Herold, C Hull, and S Thorp Visual rehabilitation in end-stage inflammatory ocular surface disease with the osteo-odonto-keratoprosthesis: results from the UK Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2008; 92(9): 1211 - 1217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y.-F. Zhang, X.-R. Cheng, Yun Chen, Bin Shi, X.-H. Chen, D.-X. Xu, and Jin Ke Three-dimensional Nanohydroxyapatite/Chitosan Scaffolds as Potential Tissue Engineered Periodontal Tissue J Biomater Appl, April 1, 2007; 21(4): 333 - 349. [Abstract] [PDF]

				E J Hollick, S L Watson, J K G Dart, P J Luthert, and B D S Allan Legeais BioKpro III keratoprosthesis implantation: long term results in seven patients. Br. J. Ophthalmol., September 1, 2006; 90(9): 1146 - 1151. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C R Hicks, T V Chirila, S Vijayasekaran, and G J Crawford PHEMA as a keratoprosthesis material Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2006; 90(1): 124 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters: