BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:1572-1575; doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.075580
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotecha, A
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D F
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kotecha, A
Right arrow Articles by Garway-Heath, D F

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

The relative effects of corneal thickness and age on Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry

A Kotecha, E T White, J M Shewry, D F Garway-Heath

Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
D F Garway-Heath
MD FRCOphth, Glaucoma Research Unit, Moorfields Eye Hospital, 162 City Road, London EC1V 2PD, UK; david.garway-heath{at}moorfields.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Aims: To establish the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT) on intraocular pressure (IOP) measured with a prototype Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), to evaluate the effect of CCT and age on the agreement between IOP measured with the Pascal DCT and Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), and to compare the interobserver and intraobserver variation of the DCT with the GAT.

Methods: GAT and DCT IOP measurements were made on 130 eyes of 130 patients and agreement was assessed by means of Bland-Altman plots. The effect of CCT and age on GAT/DCT IOP differences was assessed by linear regression analysis. Interobserver and intraobserver variations for GAT and DCT were assessed in 100 eyes of 100 patients.

Results: The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between GAT and DCT was –0.7 (–6.3 to 4.9) mm Hg. GAT/DCT IOP differences increased with thicker CCT (slope 0.017 mm Hg/µm, 95% CI 0.004 to 0.03, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.01), and with greater age, slope 0.05 mm Hg/year (95% CI 0.012 to 0.084, r2 = 0.05, p = 0.01). The intraobserver variability of GAT and DCT was 1.7 mm Hg and 3.2 mm Hg, respectively. The interobserver variability was (mean difference (95% limits of agreement)) 0.4 (–3.5 to 4.2) mm Hg for GAT and 0.2 (–4.9 to 5.3) mm Hg for DCT.

Conclusions: GAT is significantly more affected than DCT by both CCT and subject age. The effect of age suggests an age related corneal biomechanical change that may induce measurement error additional to that of CCT. The prototype DCT has greater measurement variability than the GAT.


Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; DCT, dynamic contour tonometer; GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometer; IOP, intraocular pressure; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis

Keywords: dynamic contour tonometry; central corneal thickness; age; intraobserver variability; interobserver variability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
S. A. Read, M. J. Collins, and D. R. Iskander
Diurnal Variation of Axial Length, Intraocular Pressure, and Anterior Eye Biometrics
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 2911 - 2918.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. G. Boehm, A. Weber, L. E. Pillunat, R. Koch, and E. Spoerl
Dynamic Contour Tonometry in Comparison to Intracameral IOP Measurements
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2008; 49(6): 2472 - 2477.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
K Hamilton, D Pye, S Hua, F Yu, J Chung, and Q Hou
The effect of contact lens induced oedema on the accuracy of Goldmann tonometry in a mature population
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2007; 91(12): 1636 - 1638.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
A R Ismail, M Lamont, S Perera, D Khan-Lim, R Mehta, J D A Macleod, and D F Anderson
Comparison of IOP measurement using GAT and DCT in patients with penetrating keratoplasties
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2007; 91(7): 980 - 981.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
M. C. Grieshaber, A. Schoetzau, C. Zawinka, J. Flammer, and S. Orgul
Effect of Central Corneal Thickness on Dynamic Contour Tonometry and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Primary Open-angle Glaucoma
Arch Ophthalmol, June 1, 2007; 125(6): 740 - 744.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. Kotecha, A. Elsheikh, C. R. Roberts, H. Zhu, and D. F. Garway-Heath
Corneal Thickness- and Age-Related Biomechanical Properties of the Cornea Measured with the Ocular Response Analyzer
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2006; 47(12): 5337 - 5347.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J M Gonzalez-Meijome, J Jorge, A Queiros, P Fernandes, R Montes-Mico, J B Almeida, and M A Parafita
Age differences in central and peripheral intraocular pressure using a rebound tonometer
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2006; 90(12): 1495 - 1500.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.