BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shimmura, S
Right arrow Articles by Tsubota, K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shimmura, S
Right arrow Articles by Tsubota, K
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:134-137
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Transplantation of corneal endothelium with Descemet’s membrane using a hyroxyethyl methacrylate polymer as a carrier

S Shimmura1, H Miyashita1, K Konomi1, N Shinozaki1, T Taguchi2, H Kobayashi2, J Shimazaki1, J Tanaka2, K Tsubota1,3

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, Chiba, Japan
2 Biomaterials Center, National Institute for Materials Science, Ibaragi, Japan
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Keio University, Tokyo, Japan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr S Shimmura
Department of Opthalmology, Toyko Dental College, 5-11-13 Sugano, Ichikiawa, Chiba 272-8513, Japan; shimmura{at}tdc.ac.jp


ABSTRACT
Aims: To evaluate the histology and function of Descemet’s membrane transplanted with intact endothelium.

Methods: Japanese white rabbits and human eyebank eyes were used as donors and recipients of Descemet’s membrane transplantation. Donor endothelium was hydrodissected by injecting indocyanine green from a limbal incision, and then processed as a corneal scleral button. A 6 mm diameter donor sheet was trephined, and folded in half using a 6 mm diameter polymer as a carrier. Recipient endothelium was also hydrodissected from the limbus using trypan blue to stain the Descemet’s membrane. Continuous curvilinear descemetorhexis (CCD) was performed to remove a circular section of the Descemet’s membrane using a 27 gauge cystotome. Donor tissue was inserted into the anterior chamber through a 5 mm limbal incision and apposed to the host stroma. Polymers were removed following transplantation. Similar surgical procedures were performed in both rabbits and eyebank eyes. Haematoxylin eosin stains were performed after 28 days in rabbits, and eyebank eyes were fixed immediately following surgery for endothelial cell counts.

Results: Rabbit control eyes demonstrated stromal oedema caused by loss of Descemet’s membrane, whereas transplanted eyes had clear corneas. The mean (standard deviation) pachymetry of operated eyes was 376.6 (SD 32.5) µm compared with 389.6 (SD 25.1) µm in the unoperated eye. Mean endothelial density immediately following surgery in eyebank eyes was 2749 (SD 288) cells/mm2.

Conclusions: Transplantation of Descemet’s membrane by CCD produces a functional graft with an optically clear interface similar to control cornea.


Abbreviations: CCD, continuous curvilinear descemetorhexis; DLKP, deep lamellar keratoplasty; DM, Descemet’s membrane; HE, haematoxylin eosin; PKP, penetrating keratoplasty

Keywords: corneal endothelium; Descemet’s membrane; keratoplasty; bullous keratopathy







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.