This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chihara, E Articles by Tanito, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chihara, E Articles by Tanito, M

The preoperative intraocular pressure level predicts the amount of underestimated intraocular pressure after LASIK for myopia

¹ Sensho-kai Eye Institute, Minamiyama 50–1, Iseda, Uji, Kyoto 611–0043, Japan
² Department of Biological Responses, Institute for Virus Research, Kyoto University, 53 Shogoin, Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606–8507, Japan

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Etsuo Chihara MD PhD
Sensho-kai Eye Institute, Minamiyama 50–1, Iseda, Uji, Kyoto 611–0043, Japan; chiha49{at}sa2.so-net.ne.jp

Aims: To evaluate the statistical significance of the parameters that affect underestimation of intraocular pressure (IOP) after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for myopia.

Methods: In this prospective case series study, patient age, axial length, preoperative corneal curvature, preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT), preoperative IOP, and ablation depth were studied to determine whether they affect the underestimation of IOP in the right eyes of 100 consecutive patients who underwent LASIK.

Results: The preoperative IOP was the most important parameter for an amount of underestimated Goldmann applanation tonometric IOP (GAT) and non-contact tonometric IOP (ncIOP) at 1 month (r = 0.654, p<0.0001, R² = 0.427, and r = 0.694, p<0.0001, R² = 0.481, respectively) and 3 months (r = 0.637, p<0.0001, R² = 0.406, and r = 0.726, p<0.0001, R² = 0.527, respectively). Patient age was statistically significant for underestimating the GAT at 1 month, and both the ablation depth and CCT were statistically significant parameters for underestimating the ncIOP at 1 month and at 3 months by stepwise multiple regression analysis (F>4.000). However, these parameters had small bivariate correlation coefficients, and were considered as minor parameters.

Conclusion: Preoperative IOP is the most important parameter that affects an underestimation of IOP after LASIK for myopia. Eyes with a higher true IOP have a larger underestimation of the IOP after LASIK for myopia. From these results, the importance of the modulus of elasticity on IOP measurements was discussed.

Abbreviations: CCT, central corneal thickness; GAT, Goldmann applanation tonometric IOP; IOP, intraocular pressure; IOPT, true IOP; LASIK, laser in situ keratomileusis; ncIOP, non-contact tonometric IOP

Keywords: intraocular pressure; laser in situ keratomileusis; myopia; glaucoma