BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K L
Right arrow Articles by Guest, S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, K L
Right arrow Articles by Guest, S
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:420-424
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

A comparison of outcomes after indocyanine green and trypan blue assisted internal limiting membrane peeling during macular hole surgery

K L Lee, S Dean, S Guest

Department of Ophthalmology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrStephen Guest
Department of Ophthalmology, Waikato Hospital, Hamilton, New Zealand; s.guest{at}clear.net.nz

Aims: To compare the anatomical and visual outcomes of macular hole repair surgery using indocyanine green (ICG) or trypan blue (TB) staining of the internal limiting membrane (ILM).

Method: Retrospective analysis of 37 eyes from 37 consecutive patients with stage 2, 3, and 4 idiopathic macular holes who underwent macular hole repair by one surgeon using the same technique but utilising different dyes for ILM peeling. In 19 patients ICG was used while 18 patients had TB. The anatomical and visual results in these two groups were compared.

Results: There were no significant differences in the demographic and macular hole characteristics of the ICG and TB groups. Macular hole closure was achieved in 91.9% of all patients of which the ICG group had an 89.5% hole closure rate and the TB group had a 94.4% hole closure rate. After excluding cases with failed hole closure and other vision affecting complications, there was no significant difference between the preoperative visual acuities in the TB and ICG groups but the postoperative visual acuities were better in the TB than the ICG group (p = 0.036). The TB group also had more Snellen lines of improvement than the ICG group (2.94 v 1.79 lines; p = 0.046).

Conclusion: TB appears to be less toxic than ICG when used in dye assisted peeling of ILM during macular hole repair as reflected by the better visual results in the TB group of patients.


Abbreviations: BSS, balanced salt solution; ERM, epiretinal membrane; ICG, indocyanine green; ILM, internal limiting membrane; RPE, retinal pigment epithelium; TB, trypan blue

Keywords: macular hole; indocyanine green; trypan blue


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 395. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J G Garweg, D Bergstein, B Windisch, F Koerner, and M Halberstadt
Recovery of visual field and acuity after removal of epiretinal and inner limiting membranes
Br. J. Ophthalmol., February 1, 2008; 92(2): 220 - 224.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S. Y Lesnik Oberstein, M. Mura, S. H Tan, and M. D de Smet
Heavy trypan blue staining of epiretinal membranes: an alternative to infracyanine green
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2007; 91(7): 955 - 957.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
J. Beutel, G. Dahmen, A. Ziegler, and H. Hoerauf
Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling With Indocyanine Green or Trypan Blue in Macular Hole Surgery: A Randomized Trial
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2007; 125(3): 326 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.