This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Correction (v89,p645) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Traverso, C E Articles by Belkin, M Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Traverso, C E Articles by Belkin, M Topic Collections Relevant Article

Long term effect on IOP of a stainless steel glaucoma drainage implant (Ex-PRESS) in combined surgery with phacoemulsification

¹ DiNOG, Clinica Oculistica, University of Genova, Italy
² Ophthalmology Department, Assaf Harofe Medical Center, Tsrifin, Israel
³ Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
⁴ Barzilay Medical Center, Ashkelon, Israel
⁵ Centre Ophtalmologique Kléber, Lyon, France
⁶ Ophthalmology Department, Lublin University Medical School, Lublin, Poland
⁷ Ophthalmology Department, University Hospital CHU Dijon, France
⁸ Goldschleger Eye Research Institute, Tel Hashomer, Israel

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Professor Carlo E Traverso
Department of Neurosciences, Ophthalmology and Genetics, University of Genova, Italy; mc8620{at}mclink.it

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a stainless steel miniature glaucoma drainage device (Ex-PRESS R50) for the surgical treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) and cataract when combined with phacoemulsification.

Methods: Clinical, prospective, multicentre, single treatment arm, non-randomised, non-masked study. The Ex-PRESS device was implanted at the limbus under a conjunctival flap. Phacoemulsification cataract extraction and in the bag IOL implantation were performed through clear cornea temporally. Primary outcome: IOP change; secondary outcomes: side effects and VA changes.

Results: 26 eyes of 25 patients were implanted with the device. The mean (SD) follow up was 23.9 (10.4) months and the mean age was 75.1 (7.1) years. 17/26 eyes have more than 3 years of follow up. One case was discontinued because of device removal, one because of death, and three were lost to follow up. Efficacy: preoperative IOP was 21 (4) mm Hg; at 1, 2, and 3 years IOP was 15.3 (3.1) mm Hg (35% reduction), 16.6 (2.7) mm Hg (29% reduction), and 16 (2.6) mm Hg (22% reduction) respectively. Kaplan-Meyer determined overall success rate (IOP 21 mm Hg at the last visit with or without medications) as 76.9%. The number of antiglaucoma medications was reduced by 95% at year 1. Only six patients (23%) were taking IOP lowering treatment at their last visit, five with one medication and one with two medications. Side effects: early postoperative complications were clinically mild and included six cases of hypotony (IOP <5 mm Hg), three cases of hyphaema (<2 mm) with no clinically significant further effects. Long term complications were two cases (7.7%) of device rotation (one treated by reposition) and three cases (11.5%) of conjunctival erosion at 2 and 3 years.

Conclusions: The Ex-PRESS implant, combined with phacoemulsification cataract extraction, is clinically safe and effective, maintaining in the long term a large reduction in IOP and in the number of antiglaucoma medications.

Abbreviations: 5-FU, 5-fluorouracil; CRF, case report forms; IOL, intraocular lens; IOP, intraocular pressure; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma

Keywords: Ex-PRESS implant; glaucoma; glaucoma filtering surgery; intraocular pressure; phacoemulsification

Relevant Article

Ex-PRESS implant

A Mermoud
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 396-397. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D S Mojon Minimally invasive strabismus surgery for horizontal rectus muscle reoperations Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2008; 92(12): 1648 - 1652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. G. Shellock and A. Spinazzi MRI Safety Update 2008: Part 2, Screening Patients for MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2008; 191(4): 1140 - 1149. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D S Mojon Comparison of a new, minimally invasive strabismus surgery technique with the usual limbal approach for rectus muscle recession and plication Br. J. Ophthalmol., January 1, 2007; 91(1): 76 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]