BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Doi, L M
Right arrow Articles by Prata, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Doi, L M
Right arrow Articles by Prata, J A, Jr
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:547-549
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Effects of the combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost on intraocular pressure in primary open angle glaucoma: a randomised clinical trial

L M Doi1, L A S Melo, Jr1, J A Prata, Jr1,2

1 Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
2 Faculdade de Medicina do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, Brazil

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Luiz Alberto S Melo Jr
R Leandro Dupret 488/161, São Paulo, Brazil 04025-012; luizalberto{at}oftalmo.epm.br


ABSTRACT
Aims: To evaluate the effect of the combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost on intraocular pressure (IOP) in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: An open label randomised clinical trial was conducted, which included 18 glaucomatous patients (36 eyes). In the first 4 weeks, latanoprost 0.005% was prescribed for both eyes of the patients and any other antiglaucoma medication was discontinued. In the next 4 weeks (phase 1), bimatoprost 0.03% was combined with latanoprost in one randomly assigned eye (case eye) of each patient. In the next 4 weeks (phase 2), bimatoprost was discontinued in the case eyes, while bimatoprost was substituted for latanoprost in the fellow eye (control eye). The IOP was measured at the end of the first 4 weeks (baseline measurement) and weekly during phases 1 and 2.

Results: In the case eyes, the mean IOP increased along the first phase (1.8 mm Hg; p = 0.006) when compared to baseline measurements. The IOP returned to previous values after discontinuation of bimatoprost in phase 2. In the control eyes, the mean IOP did not change throughout the study.

Conclusion: The combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost in POAG increases the IOP and should not be considered as a therapeutic option.


Abbreviations: IOP, intraocular pressure; MD, mean deviation; POAG, primary open angle glaucoma

Keywords: primary open angle glaucoma; bimatoprost; latanoprost; intraocular pressure







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.