BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Read responses to this article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cazabon, S
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cazabon, S
Right arrow Articles by Wong, D
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:799-802
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SCIENTIFIC REPORT

Visual loss following removal of intraocular silicone oil

S Cazabon, C Groenewald, I A Pearce, D Wong

St Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Sunildath Cazabon
St Paul’s Eye Unit, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Prescott Street, Liverpool, L7 8XP, UK; jcazabon{at}hotmail.com


ABSTRACT
Aim: To investigate the cause of visual loss following removal of intraocular silicone oil in patients who underwent vitrectomies for retinal detachment or giant retinal tear.

Methods: The clinical records of three cases with visual loss following removal of silicone oil were reviewed. Investigations carried out included fundus fluorescein angiogram, optical coherence tomography, and electrophysiological studies.

Results: Visual acuities dropped from 6/9 to 6/36 in two cases and 6/24 to 3/24 in the third. None of the three cases had macula detachment at any stage. Fundus fluorescein angiogram and optical coherence tomography were normal in all cases. Pattern electroretinogram showed reduced amplitudes of the P50 and N95 components. Multifocal electroretinogram indicated a selective damage to the central part of the macula.

Conclusions: The results suggest that the abnormality arises predominantly in the central part of the macula, especially the outer and middle layers. However, the exact mechanism still remains obscure.


Abbreviations: FFA, fundus fluorescein angiogram; IOL, intraocular lens; mfERG, multifocal electroretinogram; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PERG, pattern electroretinogram; VEP, visual evoked potential

Keywords: intraocular silicone oil; visual loss


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 789. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
P K Rani, R Raman, P Bhende, and T Sharma
Visual loss may be due to silicone oil tamponade effect rather than silicone oil removal
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1667 - 1667.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
R S B Newsom, R Johnston, P Sullivan, B Aylward, G Holder, and Z Gregor
Visual loss following silicone oil removal
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1668 - 1668.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
E N Herbert, S H M Liew, and T H Williamson
Visual loss after silicone oil removal
Br. J. Ophthalmol., December 1, 2005; 89(12): 1667 - 1668.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Visual loss may be due to silicone oil tamponade effect rather than silicone oil removal
Padmajakumari Rani, et al.
BJO Online, 7 Sep 2005 [Full text]
Visual loss following silicone oil removal
Richard SB Newsom, et al.
BJO Online, 22 Aug 2005 [Full text]
Visual loss after silicone oil
Edward N Herbert, et al.
BJO Online, 7 Sep 2005 [Full text]



HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.