BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R C
Right arrow Articles by Wolffsohn, J S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Peterson, R C
Right arrow Articles by Wolffsohn, J S
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:828-830
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


SCIENTIFIC REPORT

The effect of digital image resolution and compression on anterior eye imaging

R C Peterson, J S Wolffsohn

School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
James S Wolffsohn
School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Aston Triangle, Birmingham B4 7ET, UK; j.s.w.wolffsohn{at}aston.ac.uk


ABSTRACT
Aim: To determine the theoretical and clinical minimum image pixel resolution and maximum compression appropriate for anterior eye image storage.

Methods: Clinical images of the bulbar conjunctiva, palpebral conjunctiva, and corneal staining were taken at the maximum resolution of Nikon:CoolPix990 (2048x1360 pixels), DVC:1312C (1280x811), and JAI:CV-S3200 (767x569) single chip cameras and the JVC:KYF58 (767x569) three chip camera. The images were stored in TIFF format and further copies created with reduced resolution or compressed. The images were then ranked for clarity on a 15 inch monitor (resolution 1280x1024) by 20 optometrists and analysed by objective image analysis grading. Theoretical calculation of the resolution necessary to detect the smallest objects of clinical interest was also conducted.

Results: Theoretical calculation suggested that the minimum resolution should be >=579 horizontal pixels at 25x magnification. Image quality was perceived subjectively as being reduced when the pixel resolution was lower than 767x569 (p<0.005) or the image was compressed as a BMP or <50% quality JPEG (p<0.005). Objective image analysis techniques were less susceptible to changes in image quality, particularly when using colour extraction techniques.

Conclusion: It is appropriate to store anterior eye images at between 1280x811 and 767x569 pixel resolution and at up to 1:70 JPEG compression.


Abbreviations: BMP, bit mapped graphics format; JPEG, Joint Photographic Experts Group; SVGA, super video graphics array; TIFF, tagged image file format

Keywords: resolution; compression; anterior eye imaging; digital grading







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.