BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Philip, S
Right arrow Articles by Olson, J A
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Philip, S
Right arrow Articles by Olson, J A
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:891-896
© 2005 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd


EXTENDED REPORT

The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland’s grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services

S Philip, L M Cowie, J A Olson

Grampian Diabetes Retinal Screening Programme, Woolmanhill, Aberdeen AB25 1LD, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr John Olson
Grampian Diabetes Retinal Screening Programme, Woolmanhill, Aberdeen AB25 1LD, UK

Aim: To ascertain the impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland’s grading model on referrals to ophthalmology services.

Methods: An analysis was performed of the screening outcomes of 5575 consecutive patients, who were screened by the Grampian Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Programme between March and September 2003 according to the recommendations of the Health Technology Board and the Scottish Diabetic Retinopathy Grading Scheme 2003.

Results: 3066 (55%) were male. The median age was 65 years. 5.4% were passed on to the level 3 grader and 3.4% were finally referred to ophthalmology services. 2.3% required re-screening in 6 months; 85% were screened without mydriasis; 11.9% had ungradeable images despite a staged mydriasis protocol. Time to complete grading was 32 days (22–45).

Conclusion: The impact of the Health Technology Board for Scotland’s recommendations on referrals to ophthalmology services is modest and should be containable within existing resources.


Keywords: diabetic retinopathy; screening programme; grading; digital photography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S Philip, A D Fleming, K A Goatman, S Fonseca, P Mcnamee, G S Scotland, G J Prescott, P F Sharp, and J A Olson
The efficacy of automated "disease/no disease" grading for diabetic retinopathy in a systematic screening programme
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2007; 91(11): 1512 - 1517.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
A. D. Fleming, S. Philip, K. A. Goatman, J. A. Olson, and P. F. Sharp
Automated assessment of diabetic retinal image quality based on clarity and field definition.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., March 1, 2006; 47(3): 1120 - 1125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.