This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Stevenson, M R Articles by Plowman, N Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Stevenson, M R Articles by Plowman, N Topic Collections Relevant Article

Visual functioning and quality of life in the SubFoveal Radiotherapy Study (SFRADS): SFRADS report 2

¹ Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Queen’s University Belfast, UK
² Centre for statistics, Keele University, Keele, UK
³ Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK
⁴ Eye Unit, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, UK
⁵ Wessex Radiotherapy Centre, Southampton, UK
⁶ Northern Ireland Radiotherapy Centre, Belfast, UK
⁷ Department of Economics and Politics, University of Ulster, Jordanstown, UK
⁸ Department of Radiation Oncology, St Bartholomews Hospital, London, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Usha Chakravarthy
Ophthalmology and Vision Science, Royal Hospitals, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK; u.Chakravarthy{at}qub.ac.uk

Aims: To determine whether or not self reported visual functioning and quality of life in patients with choroidal neovascularisation caused by age related macular degeneration (AMD) is better in those treated with 12 Gy external beam radiotherapy in comparison with untreated subjects.

Methods: A multicentre single masked randomised controlled trial of 12 Gy of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivered as 6x2 Gy fractions to the macula of an affected eye versus observation. Patients with AMD, aged 60 years or over, in three UK hospital units, who had subfoveal CNV and a visual acuity equal to or better than 6/60 (logMAR 1.0).

Methods: Data from 199 eligible participants who were randomly assigned to 12 Gy teletherapy or observation were available for analysis. Visual function assessment, ophthalmic examination, and fundus fluorescein angiography were undertaken at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after study entry. To assess patient centred outcomes, subjects were asked to complete the Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision (DLTV) and the SF-36 questionnaires at baseline, 6, 12, and 24 months after enrolment to the study. Cross sectional and longitudinal analyses were conducted using arm of study as grouping variable. Regression analysis was employed to adjust for the effect of baseline co-variates on outcome at 12 months and 24 months.

Results: Both control and treated subjects had significant losses in visual functioning as seen by a progressive decline in mean scores in the four dimensions of the DLTV. There were no statistically significant differences between treatment and control subjects in any of dimensions of the DLTV at 12 months or 24 months after study entry. Regression analysis confirmed that treatment status had no effect on the change in DLTV dimensional scores.

Conclusions: The small benefits noted in clinical measures of vision in treated eyes did not translate into better self reported visual functioning in patients who received treatment when compared with the control arm. These findings have implications for the design of future clinical trials and studies.

Abbreviations: AMD, age related macular degeneration; CS, contrast sensitivity; DLTV, Daily Living Tasks Dependent on Vision; DVA, distance visual acuity; EBRT, external beam radiation therapy; NVA, near visual acuity; SFRADS, SubFoveal Radiotherapy Study

Keywords: quality of life; visual functioning

Relevant Article

BJO at a glance

Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 931. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]