BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:971-975; doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.060723
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, P H
Right arrow Articles by Harney, B
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scanlon, P H
Right arrow Articles by Harney, B

SCIENTIFIC REPORT

An evaluation of the change in activity and workload arising from diabetic ophthalmology referrals following the introduction of a community based digital retinal photographic screening programme

P H Scanlon1, S Carter1, C Foy2, D Ratiram1, B Harney1

1 Gloucestershire Eye Unit, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK
2 Gloucestershire R & D Support Unit, Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr P H Scanlon
Gloucestershire Eye Unit, Cheltenham General Hospital, Sandford Road, Cheltenham GL53 7AN, UK; peter.scanlon{at}glos.nhs.uk


ABSTRACT
Aims: To determine how the workload of an ophthalmology department changed following the introduction of an organised retinal screening programme.

Methods: Information was collected from the hospital medical record of people with diabetes attending eye clinics over 4 years. The first year was before screening, the next 2 years the first round, and the fourth year the second round.

Results: The total number of people with diabetes referred each year over the 4 year period was 853, 954, 974, 1051 consecutively. The number of people with diabetes in the county rose by 1400 per annum. The total number of referrals for an opinion about diabetic retinopathy was 227, 333, 363, 368, for cataract was 64, 57, 77, 93, and for glaucoma was 57, 62, 61, 68. The total number of patients referred for laser treatment over the 4 years was 77, 124, 111, and 63

Conclusion: This study suggests that the workload in the eye clinic increases in the first round of screening but in subsequent rounds it does not fall below the pre-screening level, except for laser treatment. This may be partly because of increasing numbers of people with diabetes. With the introduction of a national screening programme, this has significant workload implications for the National Health Service.


Abbreviations: DR, diabetic retinopathy; GDESS, Gloucestershire Diabetic Eye Screening Service

Keywords: screening; diabetic retinopathy; digital photography




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
J. H. Vallance, P. J. Wilson, G. P. Leese, R. McAlpine, C. J. MacEwen, and J. D. Ellis
Diabetic Retinopathy: More Patients, Less Laser: A longitudinal population-based study in Tayside, Scotland
Diabetes Care, June 1, 2008; 31(6): 1126 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.