BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:1094-1096; doi:10.1136/bjo.2004.059519
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weir, R E
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weir, R E
Right arrow Articles by Lovering, A M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

WORLD VIEW

Variability in the content of Indian generic ciprofloxacin eye drops

R E Weir1,2, F H Zaidi3, D G Charteris2, C Bunce2, M Soltani4, A M Lovering4

1 Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK
2 Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK
3 Department of Ophthalmology, Imperial College London, UK
4 Bristol Centre for Antimicrobial Research and Evaluation, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr R E P Weir
Institute of Ophthalmology, University College London, UK; repweir{at}yahoo.co.uk


ABSTRACT
Background/aims: Under-potent generic antibiotics sold in developing world countries may be contributing to positive selection of resistance organisms and to unpredictability in clinical outcome, leading to a loss of confidence among physicians locally. The objective of this study was to determine whether reports of unpredictable outcome for generic ciprofloxacin antibiotic eye drops in India could be the result of inadequate concentration of preparations sold by pharmacies.

Methods: 130 ciprofloxacin eye drop samples sold by pharmacies were collected from seven locations in north, central, and south India; 30 were randomly selected for testing. All samples were assayed using validated methods of reverse phase chromatography and fluorescence detection at a international antibiotic reference laboratory in the United Kingdom. Results were compared with advertised concentrations within the context of internationally accepted variability ranges.

Results: In total, six out of the 30 samples tested had ciprofloxacin concentrations lower than the standard advisory ranges of plus or minus 5% of stated content for 3 mg/ml pharmaceutical preparations. The ciprofloxacin content of these eye drops ranged from –36.4% to –16.1% of the stated content (median –21.73%). 24 out of 30 samples were found to be over the standard advisory ranges of plus or minus 5%, at a median of +19.42% (interquartile range (IQR) +14.28 to +25.13). Intra-batch variability of two selected samples was wide at –22.83% to +33.93% (n = 11) and –17.07% to +31.20% (n = 12).

Conclusions: Approximately 20% of generic ciprofloxacin eye drops, purchased without prescription in India were under-potent. In a number of preparations the antibiotic content was sufficiently low as to have a potential impact on clinical outcome and possibly lead to the selection of resistant isolates in individual patients. More widespread studies are justified to identify the extent of under-potency of widely used generic antibiotic medications in developing countries.


Keywords: eye drops; ciprofloxacin; India


Relevant Article

BJO at a glance
Creig Hoyt
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1073a. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J Aboshiha, R Weir, P Singh, P Ewings, and A Lovering
To what extent does a lack of refrigeration of generic chloramphenicol eye-drops used in India decrease their purity and what are the implications for Europe?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., May 1, 2008; 92(5): 609 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.