BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2005;89:1139-1142; doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.070011
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tóth, M
Right arrow Articles by Holló, G
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tóth, M
Right arrow Articles by Holló, G

EXTENDED REPORT

Enhanced corneal compensation for scanning laser polarimetry on eyes with atypical polarisation pattern

M Tóth, G Holló

Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr G Holló
Tömö u 25–29, 1083 Budapest, Hungary; hg{at}szem1.sote.hu

Aim: To investigate the potential advantage of an enhanced corneal compensation algorithm (ECC) compared with variable corneal compensation (VCC) in the analysis of scanning laser polarimetric (SLP) images with atypical retardation pattern (ARP).

Methods: SLP-VCC images with ARP (typical scan score (TSS) <80) of one eye of each of 27 glaucoma patients and 19 healthy subjects were compared with the corresponding SLP-ECC images obtained at the same session.

Results: ARP was present in 10.4% of the normals and 15.5% of the glaucoma patients imaged with SLP-VCC over 9 months. In both groups TSS was higher for ECC than for VCC (p<0.001). In glaucoma TSNIT, superior and inferior average thickness values were significantly lower, and TSNIT (measuring ellipse around the optic nerve head in the four (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior) quadrants) standard deviation was significantly higher with ECC than with VCC (p<0.001). In the normal group nerve fibre indicator (NFI) was lower with ECC than with VCC (p = 0.007). TSNIT average was smaller and TSNIT standard deviation was higher with ECC (p<0.001). Superior and inferior average thickness did not differ between VCC and ECC in the normal group.

Conclusions: The new ECC software substantially improves polarimetric image analysis on eyes showing atypical polarisation pattern.


Abbreviations: ARP, atypical retardation pattern; ECC, enhanced corneal compensation; RNFLT, retinal nerve fibre layer thickness; SLP, scanning laser polarimetry; TSNIT, measuring ellipse around the optic nerve head in the four (temporal, superior, nasal, inferior) quadrants; TSS, typical scan score; VCC, variable corneal compensation

Keywords: enhanced corneal compensation; GDx; glaucoma; retinal nerve fibre layer; scanning laser polarimetry




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
IOVSHome page
E. Gotzinger, M. Pircher, B. Baumann, C. Hirn, C. Vass, and C. K. Hitzenberger
Analysis of the Origin of Atypical Scanning Laser Polarimetry Patterns by Polarization-Sensitive Optical Coherence Tomography
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., December 1, 2008; 49(12): 5366 - 5372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S Morishita, T Tanabe, S Yu, M Hangai, T Ojima, H Aikawa, and N Yoshimura
Retinal nerve fibre layer assessment in myopic glaucomatous eyes: comparison of GDx variable corneal compensation with GDx enhanced corneal compensation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2008; 92(10): 1377 - 1381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
J Choi, K H Kim, C H Lee, H Cho, K R Sung, J Y Choi, B-J Cho, and M S Kook
Relationship between retinal nerve fibre layer measurements and retinal sensitivity by scanning laser polarimetry with variable and enhanced corneal compensation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., July 1, 2008; 92(7): 906 - 911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
F. A. Medeiros, C. Bowd, L. M. Zangwill, C. Patel, and R. N. Weinreb
Detection of Glaucoma Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced Corneal Compensation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., July 1, 2007; 48(7): 3146 - 3153.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
M. Sehi, S. Ume, D. S. Greenfield, and Advanced Imaging in Glaucoma Study Group
Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Enhanced Corneal Compensation and Optical Coherence Tomography in Normal and Glaucomatous Eyes
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., May 1, 2007; 48(5): 2099 - 2104.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
T. A. Mai, N. J. Reus, and H. G. Lemij
Structure-Function Relationship Is Stronger with Enhanced Corneal Compensation than with Variable Corneal Compensation in Scanning Laser Polarimetry
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., April 1, 2007; 48(4): 1651 - 1658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
C. Bowd, F. A. Medeiros, R. N. Weinreb, and L. M. Zangwill
The Effect of Atypical Birefringence Patterns on Glaucoma Detection Using Scanning Laser Polarimetry with Variable Corneal Compensation
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2007; 48(1): 223 - 227.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
IOVSHome page
N. J. Reus, Q. Zhou, and H. G. Lemij
Enhanced imaging algorithm for scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation.
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., September 1, 2006; 47(9): 3870 - 3877.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
M Sehi, D C Guaqueta, and D S Greenfield
An enhancement module to improve the atypical birefringence pattern using scanning laser polarimetry with variable corneal compensation
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2006; 90(6): 749 - 753.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2005 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.