This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Submit a response Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this link to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Add article to my folders Download to citation manager Request Permissions Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Phillips, J R Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Phillips, J R Topic Collections Relevant Article

Monovision slows juvenile myopia progression unilaterally

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
Dr J R Phillips
Department of Optometry and Vision Science, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand; j.phillips{at}auckland.ac.nz

Aim: To evaluate the acceptability, effectivity, and side effects of a monovision spectacle correction designed to reduce accommodation and myopia progression in schoolchildren.

Methods: Dominant eyes of 11 year old children with myopia (–1.00 to –3.00 D mean spherical equivalent) were corrected for distance; fellow eyes were uncorrected or corrected to keep the refractive imbalance 2.00 D. Myopia progression was followed with cycloplegic autorefraction and A-scan ultrasonography measures of vitreous chamber depth (VCD) for up to 30 months. Dynamic retinoscopy was used to assess accommodation while reading.

Results: All children accommodated to read with the distance corrected (dominant) eye. Thus, the near corrected eye experienced myopic defocus at all levels of accommodation. Myopia progression in the near corrected eyes was significantly slower than in the distance corrected eyes (inter-eye difference = 0.36 D/year (95% CI: 0.54 to 0.19, p = 0.0015, n = 13); difference in VCD elongation = 0.13 mm/year (95% CI: 0.18 to 0.08, p = 0.0003, n = 13)). After refitting with conventional spectacles, the resultant anisometropia returned to baseline levels after 9–18 months.

Conclusions: Monovision is not effective in reducing accommodation in juvenile myopia. However, myopia progression was significantly reduced in the near corrected eye, suggesting that sustained myopic defocus slows axial elongation of the human eye.

Abbreviations: ACD, anterior chamber depth; AXL, axial length; LT, lens thickness; PALs, progressive addition lenses; REML, restricted maximum likelihood; SER, spherical equivalent refraction; VCD, vitreous chamber depth

Keywords: ametropia; eyeglasses; refraction; accommodation; children

Relevant Article

Monovision slows myopia progression

J A Guggenheim and C H To
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2005 89: 1076-1077. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T. T. Norton, J. T. Siegwart Jr, and A. O. Amedo Effectiveness of Hyperopic Defocus, Minimal Defocus, or Myopic Defocus in Competition with a Myopiagenic Stimulus in Tree Shrew Eyes Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., November 1, 2006; 47(11): 4687 - 4699. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]