BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2006;90:744-748; doi:10.1136/bjo.2005.082115
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, M J
Right arrow Articles by Dua, H S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hawker, M J
Right arrow Articles by Dua, H S

EXTENDED REPORT

Detecting glaucoma with RADAAR: the Bridlington Eye Assessment Project

M J Hawker, S A Vernon, C L Tattersall, H S Dua

Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

Correspondence to:
Correspondence to:
MrStephen A Vernon
Department of Ophthalmology, Queen’s Medical Centre, University Hospital, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK; stephen.vernon{at}qmc.nhs.uk

Aims: To develop a diagnostic algorithm using rim/disc area asymmetry ratio (RADAAR) to discriminate between normal and glaucomatous eyes using the Heidelberg retina tomograph (HRT).

Methods: RADAAR was calculated by dividing rim/disc area ratio of the larger disc by that of the smaller disc. RADAAR normal tolerances in each disc sector were generated using 611 population based normal elderly individuals (mean age 72.5 years). Overall status for each individual was equal to the worst disc sector. Sensitivity was assessed in 45 patients with open angle glaucoma.

Results: RADAAR variance was significantly greater in glaucoma compared with normality in all disc sectors (p<0.001). Normal RADAAR limits were not dependent on age or sex. Overall, at the 99th percentile limit, the diagnostic algorithm’s specificity was 95.1% with a sensitivity of 55.6%. Males with glaucoma showed greater RADAAR variance than females. Corresponding sensitivity of the diagnostic algorithm was 63.0% and 44.4% in males and females respectively, although this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.43).

Conclusion: The RADAAR diagnostic algorithm detected glaucoma with moderate sensitivity but was limited by significant numbers of glaucoma patients with symmetrical optic disc changes. RADAAR may have greater sensitivity in males than in females although this requires confirmation in further studies.


Abbreviations: BEAP, Bridlington Eye Assessment Project; CDR, cup/disc ratio; HRT, Heidelberg retina tomograph; MD, median difference; RADAAR, rim area/disc area asymmetry ratio

Keywords: glaucoma; optic nerve head; asymmetry; confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S A Vernon, A P Rotchford, A Negi, S Ryatt, and C Tattersal
Peripapillary retinal nerve fibre layer thickness in highly myopic Caucasians as measured by Stratus optical coherence tomography
Br. J. Ophthalmol., August 1, 2008; 92(8): 1076 - 1080.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.