BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 30 May 2007. doi:10.1136/bjo.2006.113902
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:1318-1322
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2006.113902v1
91/10/1318    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lux, A.
Right arrow Articles by Joussen, A. M
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lux, A.
Right arrow Articles by Joussen, A. M
Topic Collections
Right arrowRelevant Article

EXTENDED REPORT

Non-responders to bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy of choroidal neovascular lesions

Anja Lux, Helene Llacer, Florian M A Heussen, Antonia M Joussen

Department of Ophthalmology, University of Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany and Department of Vitreoretinal Surgery, Center for Ophthalmology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany

Correspondence to:
Antonia M Joussen, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Düsseldorf, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany; Joussena{at}googlemail.com

Aims: To determine the characteristics of "non-responders" to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment in choroidal neovascularisation (CNV).

Methods: Forty-three patients with visual loss due to neovascular age-related macular disease (ARMD) (44 eyes) underwent intravitreal injections of 1.25 mg (0.05 ml) bevacizumab and were followed up every 4 weeks for 2, 3 or 6 months. Re-injection was performed when persistent leakage of the CNV was determined by fluorescein angiography and retinal oedema was assessed by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Non-responders were defined as those patients having reduced or stable visual acuity at the last follow-up.

Results: 45% of the patients were non-responders. In this group the initial CNV size was significantly larger than in the responders. Initial reading ability was significantly lower in non-responders, but the initial foveal oedema was similar in both groups. Gains in mean visual acuity and reading ability were independent of lesion type. The proportion of non-responders to responders in the different lesion type groups was equally distributed. Only patients with the classic type of CNV seemed to respond better.

Conclusions: In this study initial reasons for non-responders to intravitreal bevacizumab treatment in CNV are given. The efficiency of bevacizumab depends on initial lesion size and initial reading ability, but is independent of the amount of intraretinal and subretinal fluid. There was no general ineffectiveness of bevacizumab with any particular lesion type.


Abbreviations: ARMD, age-related macular disease; CNV, choroidal neovascularisation; OCT, optical coherence tomography; PED, pigment epithelial detachment; PDT, photodynamic therapy; VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor


Relevant Article

Anti-VEGF for neovascular ARMD: visual improvement as the goal of therapy?
Silvia Bopp
Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2007 91: 1259-1260. [Extract] [Full Text] [PDF]



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
N Nigam, J Hedaya, and W R Freeman
Non-responders to bevacizumab (Avastin) therapy of choroidal neovascular lesions
Br. J. Ophthalmol., June 1, 2008; 92(6): 864 - 865.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
S. Bopp
Anti-VEGF for neovascular ARMD: visual improvement as the goal of therapy?
Br. J. Ophthalmol., October 1, 2007; 91(10): 1259 - 1260.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.