BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2007;91:1425-1429; doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.120659
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rani, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Rani, P. K.
Right arrow Articles by Sharma, T.

WORLD VIEW

Analysis of a comprehensive diabetic retinopathy screening model for rural and urban diabetics in developing countries

Padmaja Kumari Rani, Rajiv Raman, Vikranth Sharma, Sachin Vasant Mahuli, Arokiasamy Tarigopala, R R Sudhir, Govindasamy Kumaramanickavel, Tarun Sharma

Sankara Nethralaya Diabetic Retinopathy Project, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Correspondence to:
Dr Tarun Sharma, Shri Bhagwan Mahavir Vitreoretinal Services, Sankara Nethralaya, 18 College Road, Chennai 600 006, Tamil Nadu, India; drtaruns{at}gmail.com


ABSTRACT
Aim: To present an analysis of a screening model for diabetic retinopathy and compare the results of screening between rural and urban populations.

Methods: Between June 2003 and September 2004, 51 diabetic retinopathy screening camps (rural, 25; urban, 26) were conducted in three southern districts of India. The target population, aged 30 years and above, underwent comprehensive eye evaluation and those with referable diabetic retinopathy (proliferative diabetic retinopathy, severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy, severe diabetic macular oedema, or a combination of these) were referred to the base hospital for further treatment.

Results: Among 7716 diabetic subjects, the age and sex adjusted prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 18% in the rural areas and 17% in the urban areas. The prevalence of referable retinopathy was 6.8% in rural areas and 4.6% in urban areas (p<0.001). Around 63% of individuals in rural areas and 75% in urban areas had never previously had their eyes examined for diabetic retinopathy. Multivariate analysis revealed the following risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: age more than 50 years, known diabetes, prolonged duration of diabetes, and eyes with moderate or severe visual impairment (p<0.0001).

Conclusions: The study describes a comprehensive diabetic retinopathy screening model which can identify sight threatening retinopathy and provide necessary treatment for rural and urban populations.


Keywords: diabetic retinopathy screening; developing countries; rural population; urban population


FOOTNOTES
Competing interests: None declared.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2007 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.