BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

Published Online First: 25 October 2007. doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.118760
British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:191-196
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
bjo.2007.118760v1
92/2/191    most recent
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bearelly, S
Right arrow Articles by Cousins, S W
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bearelly, S
Right arrow Articles by Cousins, S W

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

The role of dynamic indocyanine green angiography in the diagnosis and treatment of retinal angiomatous proliferation

S Bearelly1, D G Espinosa-Heidmann2,3, S W Cousins1,2

1 Duke Center for Macular Diseases and Albert Eye Research Institute, Duke University Eye Center, Durham, NC, USA
2 The Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
3 Medical College of Georgia, Department of Ophthalmology, Augusta, GA, USA

Correspondence to:
S W Cousins, Duke Center for Macular Diseases, Duke University Eye Center, Box 3802 Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710, USA; scott.cousins{at}duke.edu

Aims: We compared the effectiveness and durability of indocyanine green angiography (ICG) directed focal thermal laser treatment of the afferent arteriole in the treatment of retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP).

Methods: Sixteen consecutive patients presenting with stage I or II RAP lesions underwent optical coherence tomography, fluorescein angiography and dynamic ICG examination and were evaluated for response to treatment. Two groups were evaluated: focal laser as initial treatment; and focal laser as salvage treatment after recurrence with photodynamic therapy (PDT) and intravitreal triamcinolone. Five additional eyes with stage III RAP were evaluated separately.

Results: Seven eyes received focal laser as initial treatment, and nine eyes received focal laser as salvage treatment after failure of PDT with triamcinolone. Five of seven eyes in the initial focal laser group demonstrated resolution of oedema. All five of the responders recurred (mean 4.4 months). Salvage therapy with PDT and triamcinolone after focal laser failure transiently closed these recurrences. In contrast, eight of nine eyes receiving thermal ablation of the RAP lesion after recurrence from prior PDT/triamcinolone demonstrated initial improvement of the retinal oedema. Four eyes demonstrated no recurrence within a year. None of the five eyes with stage III RAP improved anatomically or visually.

Conclusion: Focal thermal laser treatment of RAP arteriole can resolve retinal oedema. However, durability was longer in eyes with prior PDT and triamcinolone treatment than those receiving thermal laser as initial therapy. These results suggest that focal laser may be useful in treatment of RAP recurrences and that combination therapy with PDT/triamcinolone plus focal laser is better than focal laser alone.


Competing interests: None.

Ethics approval: This work has been supported in part by an unrestricted research grant from Research to Prevent Blindness.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.