BJO

HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
[Advanced]

British Journal of Ophthalmology 2008;92:901-905; doi:10.1136/bjo.2007.135350
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Harju, M
Right arrow Articles by Vesti, E
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Harju, M
Right arrow Articles by Vesti, E

ORIGINAL ARTICLES

Reversal of optic disc cupping in glaucoma

M Harju, J Saari, L Kurvinen, E Vesti

Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

Correspondence to:
Dr M Harju, Helsinki University Eye Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PO Box 220, 00029 Hus, Finland; mika.harju{at}aad.fi

Aim: To study whether reversal of optic disc cupping after intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction is related to risk of glaucoma progression.

Methods: In this prospective follow-up study, where 51 patients with exfoliation glaucoma and five with ocular hypertension combined with exfoliation syndrome were followed for 6 years after IOP reduction, 24 showed progression of glaucoma in visual fields or optic nerve head (ONH) stereophotographs. ONH topography was measured with the Heidelberg Retina Tomograph (HRT). A decrease in HRT parameter cup volume of more than 5% was considered cup reversal. Multiple logistic regression was used to model progression of glaucoma.

Results: Cup reversal (OR 0.226; 95% CI 0.055 to 0.918, p = 0.037), final IOP (OR 1.216; 95% CI 1.000 to 1.479, p = 0.050) and visual field mean defect at entry (OR 1.158; 95% CI 1.034 to 1.296, p = 0.011) were associated with progression. IOP change from study entry to 6-year control visit was not associated with progression (OR 0.964, 95% CI 0.850 to 1.092, p = 0.56).

Conclusion: Cup reversal seemed to be an independent protective factor for progression of glaucoma.


Funding: Financial support was provided by Silmäsäätiö (The Eye Foundation), Mary och C. Ehrnrooths Stiftelse and Glaukooma tukisäätiö LUX (the Glaucoma Foundation LUX).

Competing interests: None.

Ethics approval: The procedures followed the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Helsinki University Eye Hospital Ethics Committee.

Patient consent: Patient consent was obtained.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS REGISTER
Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online  ¦  Website terms and conditions  ¦  Privacy policy
Copyright © 2008 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.